Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2024-23081: n/a

0
Unknown
VulnerabilityCVE-2024-23081cvecve-2024-23081
Published: Mon Apr 08 2024 (04/08/2024, 00:00:00 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5

Description

ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 was discovered to contain a NullPointerException via the component org.threeten.bp.LocalDate::compareTo(ChronoLocalDate). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 02/28/2026, 09:19:26 UTC

Technical Analysis

The reported vulnerability CVE-2024-23081 concerns a potential NullPointerException in the ThreeTen Backport library version 1.6.8, specifically within the compareTo method of the LocalDate class when comparing to a ChronoLocalDate instance. A NullPointerException occurs when an application attempts to use a null reference where an object is required, which can cause the application to crash or behave unexpectedly. However, this vulnerability's existence is disputed by multiple third parties who argue that the evidence supporting the claim is insufficient and that the identification may have been generated by an automated tool lacking robustness. No specific affected versions are confirmed, and no patches or fixes have been published. Additionally, there are no known exploits in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned to this issue. The vulnerability, if it exists, would primarily affect applications that use the ThreeTen Backport library for date and time operations and invoke the compareTo method without proper null checks. Since the issue is a NullPointerException, it is unlikely to directly compromise confidentiality or integrity but could impact availability by causing application crashes or denial of service in affected software components. The lack of concrete evidence and the disputed nature of the report suggest that this vulnerability should be treated cautiously, with organizations verifying their own code usage and awaiting further clarifications or patches from the maintainers.

Potential Impact

If the vulnerability is valid, the primary impact would be on application availability due to potential crashes caused by unhandled NullPointerExceptions in date comparison operations. This could lead to denial of service conditions in applications relying on the ThreeTen Backport library, particularly if the compareTo method is called with null arguments. However, there is no indication that this issue could lead to unauthorized data access, privilege escalation, or code execution. The disputed nature and lack of confirmed exploitation reduce the immediate risk to organizations. Nevertheless, applications that critically depend on ThreeTen Backport for date/time processing might experience stability issues if this bug is triggered. The impact is thus limited to potential service disruption rather than security breaches. Organizations should consider the risk low but remain vigilant, especially if their software environment includes this library and handles date comparisons extensively.

Mitigation Recommendations

Organizations using the ThreeTen Backport library should audit their code to ensure that calls to LocalDate::compareTo and related date comparison methods never pass null arguments, thereby preventing NullPointerExceptions. Implementing explicit null checks before invoking compareTo can mitigate the risk of application crashes. Monitoring updates from the ThreeTen Backport maintainers is important to apply any future patches or clarifications. Additionally, integrating robust exception handling around date/time operations can improve resilience against unexpected null values. Since no patches are currently available, defensive coding practices and thorough testing of date comparison logic are the best immediate mitigations. If possible, consider upgrading to alternative or newer date/time libraries that have active maintenance and security support. Finally, maintain awareness of any new information or advisories regarding this CVE to respond promptly if the situation evolves.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
mitre
Date Reserved
2024-01-11T00:00:00.000Z
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 699f6d51b7ef31ef0b57044c

Added to database: 2/25/2026, 9:44:49 PM

Last enriched: 2/28/2026, 9:19:26 AM

Last updated: 4/12/2026, 3:44:56 PM

Views: 13

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses