CVE-2024-26013: Improper access control in Fortinet FortiProxy
A improper restriction of communication channel to intended endpoints vulnerability [CWE-923] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15 and before 6.2.16, Fortinet FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9 and before 7.0.15, Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 and before 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 and before 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 before 6.4.8 and Fortinet FortiWeb before 7.4.2 may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to impersonate the management device (FortiCloud server or/and in certain conditions, FortiManager), via intercepting the FGFM authentication request between the management device and the managed device
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-26013 is an improper access control vulnerability classified under CWE-923, affecting Fortinet's FortiProxy, FortiOS, FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiVoice, and FortiWeb products across multiple versions. The vulnerability arises from insufficient restrictions on communication channels between managed devices and their management servers (such as FortiCloud or FortiManager). An unauthenticated attacker in a man-in-the-middle position can intercept the Fortinet FGFM (Fortinet Generic Fabric Manager) authentication requests and impersonate the management device. This impersonation allows the attacker to potentially manipulate device configurations, intercept sensitive data, or disrupt device operations. The vulnerability affects Fortinet versions 6.2.x through 7.4.x in various products, indicating a broad attack surface. The CVSS v3.1 score is 7.1 (high), reflecting network attack vector, high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and requiring user interaction but no privileges. The vulnerability does not currently have known exploits in the wild, but the complexity of the attack is moderate due to the need for MitM positioning and user interaction. The flaw highlights a critical weakness in the authentication and communication channel validation mechanisms within Fortinet's management protocols.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2024-26013 is significant for organizations using affected Fortinet products, especially those relying on FortiProxy, FortiOS, FortiManager, and related devices for network security and management. Successful exploitation can lead to full compromise of device confidentiality, allowing attackers to intercept sensitive management traffic, steal credentials, or gain unauthorized access to device configurations. Integrity can be compromised by unauthorized changes to device settings, potentially enabling persistent backdoors or disabling security controls. Availability may also be affected if attackers disrupt communication between management and managed devices, causing operational outages. Given Fortinet's widespread use in enterprise, government, and critical infrastructure networks globally, this vulnerability poses a risk of large-scale network compromise, data breaches, and service disruptions. The requirement for MitM access limits exploitation to attackers with network proximity or control, but this is feasible in many environments such as compromised internal networks or targeted attacks on VPNs and WAN links.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-26013, organizations should immediately apply vendor-provided patches or updates once available for all affected Fortinet products and versions. Until patches are deployed, network segmentation should be enforced to isolate management traffic from untrusted networks and reduce the risk of MitM attacks. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on management interfaces, including the use of dedicated management VLANs and encrypted tunnels (e.g., IPsec or TLS) for FGFM communication. Deploy network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to detect anomalous traffic patterns indicative of MitM or replay attacks. Regularly audit and verify device configurations and logs for signs of unauthorized changes. Additionally, enable multi-factor authentication and restrict administrative access to trusted hosts only. Organizations should also review and harden their network infrastructure to prevent attackers from gaining MitM positions, such as securing wireless networks, disabling unused ports, and employing ARP spoofing detection tools. Finally, maintain up-to-date incident response plans to quickly address potential exploitation attempts.
Affected Countries
United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Russia, Singapore, Netherlands
CVE-2024-26013: Improper access control in Fortinet FortiProxy
Description
A improper restriction of communication channel to intended endpoints vulnerability [CWE-923] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15 and before 6.2.16, Fortinet FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9 and before 7.0.15, Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 and before 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 and before 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 before 6.4.8 and Fortinet FortiWeb before 7.4.2 may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to impersonate the management device (FortiCloud server or/and in certain conditions, FortiManager), via intercepting the FGFM authentication request between the management device and the managed device
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-26013 is an improper access control vulnerability classified under CWE-923, affecting Fortinet's FortiProxy, FortiOS, FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiVoice, and FortiWeb products across multiple versions. The vulnerability arises from insufficient restrictions on communication channels between managed devices and their management servers (such as FortiCloud or FortiManager). An unauthenticated attacker in a man-in-the-middle position can intercept the Fortinet FGFM (Fortinet Generic Fabric Manager) authentication requests and impersonate the management device. This impersonation allows the attacker to potentially manipulate device configurations, intercept sensitive data, or disrupt device operations. The vulnerability affects Fortinet versions 6.2.x through 7.4.x in various products, indicating a broad attack surface. The CVSS v3.1 score is 7.1 (high), reflecting network attack vector, high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and requiring user interaction but no privileges. The vulnerability does not currently have known exploits in the wild, but the complexity of the attack is moderate due to the need for MitM positioning and user interaction. The flaw highlights a critical weakness in the authentication and communication channel validation mechanisms within Fortinet's management protocols.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2024-26013 is significant for organizations using affected Fortinet products, especially those relying on FortiProxy, FortiOS, FortiManager, and related devices for network security and management. Successful exploitation can lead to full compromise of device confidentiality, allowing attackers to intercept sensitive management traffic, steal credentials, or gain unauthorized access to device configurations. Integrity can be compromised by unauthorized changes to device settings, potentially enabling persistent backdoors or disabling security controls. Availability may also be affected if attackers disrupt communication between management and managed devices, causing operational outages. Given Fortinet's widespread use in enterprise, government, and critical infrastructure networks globally, this vulnerability poses a risk of large-scale network compromise, data breaches, and service disruptions. The requirement for MitM access limits exploitation to attackers with network proximity or control, but this is feasible in many environments such as compromised internal networks or targeted attacks on VPNs and WAN links.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-26013, organizations should immediately apply vendor-provided patches or updates once available for all affected Fortinet products and versions. Until patches are deployed, network segmentation should be enforced to isolate management traffic from untrusted networks and reduce the risk of MitM attacks. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on management interfaces, including the use of dedicated management VLANs and encrypted tunnels (e.g., IPsec or TLS) for FGFM communication. Deploy network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to detect anomalous traffic patterns indicative of MitM or replay attacks. Regularly audit and verify device configurations and logs for signs of unauthorized changes. Additionally, enable multi-factor authentication and restrict administrative access to trusted hosts only. Organizations should also review and harden their network infrastructure to prevent attackers from gaining MitM positions, such as securing wireless networks, disabling unused ports, and employing ARP spoofing detection tools. Finally, maintain up-to-date incident response plans to quickly address potential exploitation attempts.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- fortinet
- Date Reserved
- 2024-02-14T09:18:43.246Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69a0a1b885912abc71d0a0c4
Added to database: 2/26/2026, 7:40:40 PM
Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 7:43:02 PM
Last updated: 2/26/2026, 11:13:49 PM
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-3268: Improper Access Controls in psi-probe PSI Probe
MediumCVE-2026-28280: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in jmpsec osctrl
MediumCVE-2026-28279: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in jmpsec osctrl
HighCVE-2026-28276: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Morelitea initiative
HighCVE-2026-28275: CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration in Morelitea initiative
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.