Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2024-2698: Incorrect Authorization

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2024-2698cvecve-2024-2698
Published: Wed Jun 12 2024 (06/12/2024, 08:03:49 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5

Description

A vulnerability was found in FreeIPA in how the initial implementation of MS-SFU by MIT Kerberos was missing a condition for granting the "forwardable" flag on S4U2Self tickets. Fixing this mistake required adding a special case for the check_allowed_to_delegate() function: If the target service argument is NULL, then it means the KDC is probing for general constrained delegation rules and not checking a specific S4U2Proxy request. In FreeIPA 4.11.0, the behavior of ipadb_match_acl() was modified to match the changes from upstream MIT Kerberos 1.20. However, a mistake resulting in this mechanism applies in cases where the target service argument is set AND where it is unset. This results in S4U2Proxy requests being accepted regardless of whether or not there is a matching service delegation rule.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/20/2025, 07:55:27 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2024-2698 is a vulnerability discovered in FreeIPA versions 4.11.0 and 4.12.0, stemming from an incorrect authorization logic in the handling of Kerberos MS-SFU extensions implemented by MIT Kerberos. Specifically, the initial implementation missed a necessary condition for granting the 'forwardable' flag on S4U2Self tickets, which are used in constrained delegation scenarios to allow a service to obtain a service ticket on behalf of a user. The fix required adding a special case in the check_allowed_to_delegate() function to differentiate between general delegation rule probes (when the target service argument is NULL) and specific S4U2Proxy requests. However, FreeIPA's adaptation of this fix introduced a logic error in the ipadb_match_acl() function, which incorrectly applies the delegation check both when the target service argument is set and when it is unset. This flaw causes the system to accept S4U2Proxy requests even if there is no matching service delegation rule, effectively bypassing intended authorization controls. Exploiting this vulnerability allows an attacker with low privileges to impersonate other users or services, potentially escalating privileges and gaining unauthorized access to sensitive resources. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8, reflecting its high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with network attack vector, low attack complexity, and no user interaction required. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the flaw poses a significant risk to environments relying on FreeIPA for Kerberos-based identity and access management.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-2698 is substantial due to the widespread use of FreeIPA and Kerberos in enterprise identity management, especially in government, finance, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure sectors. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized privilege escalation and lateral movement within networks, compromising sensitive data and disrupting services. The ability to impersonate users or services undermines trust in authentication mechanisms, potentially leading to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR violations), and operational downtime. Given the network-based attack vector and lack of user interaction requirement, attackers can remotely exploit this vulnerability, increasing the risk of widespread compromise. Organizations with complex delegation policies or those that heavily rely on constrained delegation for service-to-service authentication are particularly vulnerable. The vulnerability could also facilitate advanced persistent threats (APTs) by enabling stealthy credential abuse and persistence.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2024-2698, European organizations should: 1) Monitor FreeIPA vendor advisories and apply official patches or updates as soon as they become available, prioritizing affected versions 4.11.0 and 4.12.0. 2) Conduct a thorough audit of delegation policies and Kerberos constrained delegation configurations to identify and restrict unnecessary delegation rights. 3) Implement network segmentation and strict access controls to limit exposure of FreeIPA and Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) services to untrusted networks. 4) Enable detailed logging and monitoring of Kerberos ticket requests and delegation activities to detect anomalous or unauthorized S4U2Proxy requests. 5) Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) where possible to reduce the impact of credential misuse. 6) Review and harden service account permissions to minimize the potential for privilege escalation. 7) Educate security teams on the specifics of this vulnerability to improve incident response readiness. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on delegation policy hygiene, proactive monitoring, and network-level protections tailored to the nature of this vulnerability.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
redhat
Date Reserved
2024-03-19T21:12:01.436Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68e7a5cfba0e608b4f98d843

Added to database: 10/9/2025, 12:08:47 PM

Last enriched: 11/20/2025, 7:55:27 AM

Last updated: 12/3/2025, 6:03:04 AM

Views: 112

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats