CVE-2024-34451: n/a
Ghost through 5.85.1 allows remote attackers to bypass an authentication rate-limit protection mechanism by using many X-Forwarded-For headers with different values. NOTE: the vendor's position is that Ghost should be installed with a reverse proxy that allows only trusted X-Forwarded-For headers.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-34451 is a critical security vulnerability affecting Ghost CMS versions through 5.85.1. The flaw arises because the application’s authentication rate-limiting mechanism can be circumvented by sending multiple X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers with different IP addresses. Rate-limiting is a common defense to prevent brute-force login attempts by limiting the number of authentication tries from a single IP address. However, by injecting multiple X-Forwarded-For headers, an attacker can effectively spoof different client IP addresses, causing the rate-limiter to treat each request as coming from a unique source. This bypass allows an attacker to perform a high volume of login attempts without triggering the rate-limit protections, increasing the likelihood of successful credential guessing or brute-force attacks. The vulnerability does not require any prior authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable over the network. The vendor’s recommended mitigation is to deploy Ghost behind a reverse proxy that strictly controls and validates X-Forwarded-For headers, ensuring only trusted proxies can set or forward these headers. This approach prevents attackers from injecting arbitrary headers and abusing the rate-limiting mechanism. Although no public exploits have been reported yet, the vulnerability’s CVSS v3.1 score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) indicates a critical severity with high impact on confidentiality and integrity, as unauthorized access to Ghost CMS could lead to content manipulation or data exposure. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-1390, which relates to improper handling of HTTP headers leading to security bypasses.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2024-34451 is the potential for unauthorized access to Ghost CMS instances through brute-force or credential stuffing attacks that bypass rate-limiting protections. Successful exploitation compromises the confidentiality and integrity of the CMS, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, modify or delete content, inject malicious code, or steal sensitive user data. This can lead to website defacement, data breaches, loss of user trust, and reputational damage. Since Ghost is a popular open-source blogging and publishing platform used by organizations, media outlets, and individuals worldwide, the vulnerability poses a widespread risk. Attackers can automate large-scale attacks against vulnerable Ghost installations, especially those exposed to the internet without proper reverse proxy configurations. The lack of authentication or user interaction requirements lowers the barrier to exploitation, increasing the threat level. Organizations relying on Ghost for content management must consider this vulnerability a critical risk to their web infrastructure security.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Deploy Ghost CMS behind a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, or a cloud-based WAF) configured to accept X-Forwarded-For headers only from trusted sources. 2. Implement strict validation and sanitization of X-Forwarded-For headers at the proxy level to prevent injection of multiple or spoofed headers. 3. Update Ghost CMS to the latest version once an official patch addressing this vulnerability is released. 4. Monitor authentication logs for unusual login attempts or patterns indicative of brute-force attacks, especially from multiple IP addresses in rapid succession. 5. Consider additional multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative accounts to reduce the risk of unauthorized access. 6. Limit public exposure of Ghost administrative interfaces by IP whitelisting or VPN access where feasible. 7. Regularly review and audit reverse proxy and firewall configurations to ensure proper header handling and rate-limiting enforcement. 8. Educate security and DevOps teams about the risks of trusting client-supplied headers without validation.
Affected Countries
United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, Netherlands, India, Japan, South Korea
CVE-2024-34451: n/a
Description
Ghost through 5.85.1 allows remote attackers to bypass an authentication rate-limit protection mechanism by using many X-Forwarded-For headers with different values. NOTE: the vendor's position is that Ghost should be installed with a reverse proxy that allows only trusted X-Forwarded-For headers.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-34451 is a critical security vulnerability affecting Ghost CMS versions through 5.85.1. The flaw arises because the application’s authentication rate-limiting mechanism can be circumvented by sending multiple X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers with different IP addresses. Rate-limiting is a common defense to prevent brute-force login attempts by limiting the number of authentication tries from a single IP address. However, by injecting multiple X-Forwarded-For headers, an attacker can effectively spoof different client IP addresses, causing the rate-limiter to treat each request as coming from a unique source. This bypass allows an attacker to perform a high volume of login attempts without triggering the rate-limit protections, increasing the likelihood of successful credential guessing or brute-force attacks. The vulnerability does not require any prior authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable over the network. The vendor’s recommended mitigation is to deploy Ghost behind a reverse proxy that strictly controls and validates X-Forwarded-For headers, ensuring only trusted proxies can set or forward these headers. This approach prevents attackers from injecting arbitrary headers and abusing the rate-limiting mechanism. Although no public exploits have been reported yet, the vulnerability’s CVSS v3.1 score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) indicates a critical severity with high impact on confidentiality and integrity, as unauthorized access to Ghost CMS could lead to content manipulation or data exposure. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-1390, which relates to improper handling of HTTP headers leading to security bypasses.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2024-34451 is the potential for unauthorized access to Ghost CMS instances through brute-force or credential stuffing attacks that bypass rate-limiting protections. Successful exploitation compromises the confidentiality and integrity of the CMS, allowing attackers to gain administrative access, modify or delete content, inject malicious code, or steal sensitive user data. This can lead to website defacement, data breaches, loss of user trust, and reputational damage. Since Ghost is a popular open-source blogging and publishing platform used by organizations, media outlets, and individuals worldwide, the vulnerability poses a widespread risk. Attackers can automate large-scale attacks against vulnerable Ghost installations, especially those exposed to the internet without proper reverse proxy configurations. The lack of authentication or user interaction requirements lowers the barrier to exploitation, increasing the threat level. Organizations relying on Ghost for content management must consider this vulnerability a critical risk to their web infrastructure security.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Deploy Ghost CMS behind a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, or a cloud-based WAF) configured to accept X-Forwarded-For headers only from trusted sources. 2. Implement strict validation and sanitization of X-Forwarded-For headers at the proxy level to prevent injection of multiple or spoofed headers. 3. Update Ghost CMS to the latest version once an official patch addressing this vulnerability is released. 4. Monitor authentication logs for unusual login attempts or patterns indicative of brute-force attacks, especially from multiple IP addresses in rapid succession. 5. Consider additional multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative accounts to reduce the risk of unauthorized access. 6. Limit public exposure of Ghost administrative interfaces by IP whitelisting or VPN access where feasible. 7. Regularly review and audit reverse proxy and firewall configurations to ensure proper header handling and rate-limiting enforcement. 8. Educate security and DevOps teams about the risks of trusting client-supplied headers without validation.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2024-05-03T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 699f6c50b7ef31ef0b5627c9
Added to database: 2/25/2026, 9:40:32 PM
Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 4:43:16 AM
Last updated: 2/26/2026, 11:09:10 AM
Views: 1
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-64999: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Checkmk GmbH Checkmk
HighTrend Micro Patches Critical Apex One Vulnerabilities
CriticalCVE-2026-28138: Deserialization of Untrusted Data in Stylemix uListing
HighCVE-2026-28136: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in VeronaLabs WP SMS
HighCVE-2026-28132: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in villatheme WooCommerce Photo Reviews
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.