CVE-2024-37894: CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write in squid-cache squid
Squid is a caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. Due to an Out-of-bounds Write error when assigning ESI variables, Squid is susceptible to a Memory Corruption error. This error can lead to a Denial of Service attack.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-37894 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) affecting the Squid caching proxy software, versions from 3.0 through 6.9. The flaw occurs during the assignment of Edge Side Includes (ESI) variables, where improper bounds checking allows writing outside allocated memory buffers. This memory corruption can destabilize the Squid process, leading to a denial of service (DoS) condition by crashing the proxy service. Squid is widely used to cache and proxy HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and other web traffic, making it a critical component in many network architectures. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.3, indicating medium severity. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requiring low privileges (PR:L) but high attack complexity (AC:H), with no user interaction (UI:N) needed. The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability can affect resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no patches are currently linked, suggesting that remediation may require vendor updates or configuration changes once available. The vulnerability primarily impacts availability, with no direct confidentiality or integrity compromise. Organizations using vulnerable Squid versions risk service interruptions if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2024-37894 is the potential denial of service of Squid proxy servers, which can disrupt web caching and proxying functions critical for network performance and security. This can lead to degraded user experience, increased latency, and potential exposure of internal networks if fallback mechanisms are not properly configured. Organizations relying on Squid for content filtering, access control, or traffic optimization may face operational challenges. In sectors such as finance, government, and telecommunications, where Squid is often deployed for traffic management and security, service outages could have cascading effects on business continuity and regulatory compliance. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as part of a larger attack chain to cause disruption or distract from other malicious activities. Although exploitation requires network access and has high complexity, the low privilege requirement means insider threats or compromised internal hosts could trigger the vulnerability. The lack of user interaction needed increases the risk of automated exploitation attempts once public details become widespread.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor official Squid project channels for patches addressing CVE-2024-37894 and apply updates promptly once released. 2. Until patches are available, restrict network access to Squid proxy servers to trusted hosts and networks only, using firewall rules and network segmentation. 3. Implement strict access controls and authentication mechanisms to limit who can interact with the proxy server. 4. Disable or limit the use of ESI variables if feasible, as the vulnerability is related to their assignment. 5. Continuously monitor Squid logs and system behavior for signs of crashes or unusual memory errors that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) tuned to detect anomalous traffic patterns targeting Squid services. 7. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on proxy infrastructure to identify potential exploitation vectors. 8. Prepare incident response plans to quickly recover from potential DoS events affecting proxy services. 9. Educate network and security teams about this vulnerability to ensure rapid detection and response.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-37894: CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write in squid-cache squid
Description
Squid is a caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. Due to an Out-of-bounds Write error when assigning ESI variables, Squid is susceptible to a Memory Corruption error. This error can lead to a Denial of Service attack.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-37894 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) affecting the Squid caching proxy software, versions from 3.0 through 6.9. The flaw occurs during the assignment of Edge Side Includes (ESI) variables, where improper bounds checking allows writing outside allocated memory buffers. This memory corruption can destabilize the Squid process, leading to a denial of service (DoS) condition by crashing the proxy service. Squid is widely used to cache and proxy HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and other web traffic, making it a critical component in many network architectures. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.3, indicating medium severity. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requiring low privileges (PR:L) but high attack complexity (AC:H), with no user interaction (UI:N) needed. The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability can affect resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no patches are currently linked, suggesting that remediation may require vendor updates or configuration changes once available. The vulnerability primarily impacts availability, with no direct confidentiality or integrity compromise. Organizations using vulnerable Squid versions risk service interruptions if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2024-37894 is the potential denial of service of Squid proxy servers, which can disrupt web caching and proxying functions critical for network performance and security. This can lead to degraded user experience, increased latency, and potential exposure of internal networks if fallback mechanisms are not properly configured. Organizations relying on Squid for content filtering, access control, or traffic optimization may face operational challenges. In sectors such as finance, government, and telecommunications, where Squid is often deployed for traffic management and security, service outages could have cascading effects on business continuity and regulatory compliance. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as part of a larger attack chain to cause disruption or distract from other malicious activities. Although exploitation requires network access and has high complexity, the low privilege requirement means insider threats or compromised internal hosts could trigger the vulnerability. The lack of user interaction needed increases the risk of automated exploitation attempts once public details become widespread.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor official Squid project channels for patches addressing CVE-2024-37894 and apply updates promptly once released. 2. Until patches are available, restrict network access to Squid proxy servers to trusted hosts and networks only, using firewall rules and network segmentation. 3. Implement strict access controls and authentication mechanisms to limit who can interact with the proxy server. 4. Disable or limit the use of ESI variables if feasible, as the vulnerability is related to their assignment. 5. Continuously monitor Squid logs and system behavior for signs of crashes or unusual memory errors that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) tuned to detect anomalous traffic patterns targeting Squid services. 7. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on proxy infrastructure to identify potential exploitation vectors. 8. Prepare incident response plans to quickly recover from potential DoS events affecting proxy services. 9. Educate network and security teams about this vulnerability to ensure rapid detection and response.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2024-06-10T19:54:41.361Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6909214cfe7723195e054544
Added to database: 11/3/2025, 9:40:28 PM
Last enriched: 11/3/2025, 10:18:53 PM
Last updated: 12/20/2025, 10:44:48 AM
Views: 38
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14298: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in damian-gora FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce
MediumCVE-2025-12492: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in ultimatemember Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin
MediumCVE-2025-13619: CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management in CMSSuperHeroes Flex Store Users
CriticalCVE-2025-12820: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in Pure WC Variation Swatches
UnknownCVE-2025-14735: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in nestornoe Amazon affiliate lite Plugin
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.