CVE-2024-40685VulnerabilityPublished 4 Feb 2026

CVE-2024-40685: IBM Operations Analytics – Log Analysis · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Affects IBM Operations Analytics – Log AnalysisSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 3% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IBMOperations Analytics - Log Analysis	Affected >=1.3.5.0 <=1.3.8.3	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (12)

cpe:2.3:a:ibm:operations_analytics_-_log_analysis:1.3.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:operations_analytics_-_log_analysis:1.3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:operations_analytics_-_log_analysis:1.3.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:operations_analytics_-_log_analysis:1.3.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:operations_analytics_-_log_analysis:1.3.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:operations_analytics_-_log_analysis:1.3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

1. Monitor IBM security advisories closely and apply official patches or updates as soon as they become available to address CVE-2024-40685. 2. Implement anti-CSRF tokens in web application workflows if customization or additional controls are possible within the IBM Operations Analytics environment. 3. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting IBM analytics portals. 4. Conduct user training focused on recognizing phishing attempts and the risks of interacting with unsolicited links, especially for users with access to IBM Operations Analytics. 5. Enforce strict session management policies, including short session timeouts and re-authentication for sensitive actions, to reduce the window of opportunity for CSRF exploitation. 6. Review and restrict user privileges to the minimum necessary to limit the impact of any unauthorized actions. 7. Utilize network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of the IBM Operations Analytics interface to trusted networks and users only. 8. Regularly audit logs and configuration changes within the analytics platform to detect suspicious activities potentially related to CSRF exploitation.

Description

CVE-2024-40685 is a medium-severity Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting IBM Operations Analytics – Log Analysis versions 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.3 and IBM SmartCloud Analytics – Log Analysis. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user into performing unauthorized actions without their consent. Exploitation requires user interaction but no prior authentication or elevated privileges. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of the system by enabling unauthorized changes but does not affect confidentiality or availability.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-40685 primarily concerns the integrity of IBM Operations Analytics environments. Unauthorized actions performed via CSRF could lead to configuration changes, data manipulation, or triggering of false analytics results, which may disrupt decision-making processes or incident response activities. While confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, the integrity compromise could indirectly affect operational reliability and trust in analytics outputs. Organizations in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, energy, and government that rely heavily on IBM analytics platforms for monitoring and operational intelligence are particularly vulnerable. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to exploit this vulnerability, increasing risk in environments with less user security awareness. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers often develop exploits after public disclosure. European entities with stringent regulatory requirements around data integrity and operational security may face compliance risks if the vulnerability is exploited.

CWE-352Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Compound weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumCWE Top 25 (2025): #3OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
OWASP Cheat Sheets
REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization Testing Automation (opens in a new tab)
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V4.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
V13.3.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Domain Search Timing (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Identification (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

ibm.com/support/pages/node/7256429 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

CPE configurations (12)

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 12 Feb 2026, 07:37 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-352

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats