VulnerabilityPublished 15 Oct 2024Updated 3 Nov 2025

CVE-2024-47945: RITTAL GmbH & Co. KG IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit · Generation of Predictable Numbers or Identifiers

Affects RITTAL GmbH & Co. KG IoT Interface & CMC III Processing UnitSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.1 Critical : upgrade to 6.21.00.2 as a priority.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.1Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 58% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 6.21.00.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Oct 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade RITTAL GmbH & Co. KG IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit to 6.21.00.2.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
RITTAL GmbH & Co. KG IoT Interface & CMC III Processing Unit	Affected <6.21.00.2	Fixed in 6.21.00.2

AI-suggested

1. 2. If you cannot patch yet, implement network segmentation to isolate vulnerable devices from broader enterprise networks, limiting attacker access. 3. Deploy strict access controls and monitor network traffic for anomalous session ID usage or repeated session attempts indicative of brute-force or pre-generation attacks. 4. Use VPNs or secure tunnels for remote access to these devices to add an additional layer of authentication and encryption. 5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on IoT and industrial control systems to detect exploitation attempts early. 6. Collaborate with RITTAL support and cybersecurity vendors for threat intelligence sharing and incident response planning. 7. Consider disabling remote management interfaces if not strictly necessary or restrict them to trusted IP ranges.

Description

The devices are vulnerable to session hijacking due to insufficient entropy in its session ID generation algorithm. The session IDs are predictable, with only 32,768 possible values per user, which allows attackers to pre-generate valid session IDs, leading to unauthorized access to user sessions. This is not only due to the use of an (insecure) rand() function call but also because of missing initialization via srand(). As a result only the PIDs are effectively used as seed.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a severe risk, especially those in industrial automation, manufacturing, and critical infrastructure sectors that deploy RITTAL IoT Interface and CMC III Processing Units. Unauthorized session hijacking can lead to exposure of sensitive operational data, unauthorized control commands, and potential sabotage or espionage. Confidentiality and integrity of data are directly compromised, which can disrupt trust in automated systems and lead to regulatory non-compliance under GDPR if personal or sensitive data is involved. Although availability is not directly impacted, the indirect effects of unauthorized access could cause operational disruptions. The ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction increases the threat level, making it attractive for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors targeting European industrial environments. This could also affect supply chains and critical infrastructure resilience within Europe.

CWE-340Generation of Predictable Numbers or Identifiers (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A04:2025: Cryptographic Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product uses a scheme that generates numbers or identifiers that are more predictable than required.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Forgot Password (opens in a new tab)
Transport Layer Protection (opens in a new tab)
User Privacy Protection (opens in a new tab)
Password Storage (opens in a new tab)
Cryptographic Storage (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V2.6.2 (opens in a new tab)
V2.7.6 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 23:35 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-340

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats