CVE-2024-6538: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
A flaw was found in OpenShift Console. A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack can happen if an attacker supplies all or part of a URL to the server to query. The server is considered to be in a privileged network position and can often reach exposed services that aren't readily available to clients due to network filtering. Leveraging such an attack vector, the attacker can have an impact on other services and potentially disclose information or have other nefarious effects on the system. The /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint on the OpenShift Console allows authenticated users to have the console's pod perform arbitrary and fully controlled HTTP(s) requests. The full response to these requests is returned by the endpoint. While the name of this endpoint suggests the requests are only bound to the internet, no such checks are in place. An authenticated user can therefore ask the console to perform arbitrary HTTP requests from outside the cluster to a service inside the cluster.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-6538 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the OpenShift Console version 6.0.0. The issue resides in the /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint, which is intended to allow the console pod to perform HTTP(S) requests to internet resources. However, the endpoint lacks proper validation and filtering, allowing authenticated users to craft arbitrary URLs, including those targeting internal cluster services that are normally inaccessible due to network segmentation and filtering. Because the OpenShift Console pod operates within a privileged network position inside the cluster, this SSRF flaw can be leveraged to access sensitive internal services, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation. The vulnerability requires the attacker to be authenticated but does not require additional privileges or user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.3, reflecting a medium severity level primarily due to the confidentiality impact and ease of exploitation. There are no known public exploits at this time. The flaw highlights the risk of insufficient input validation and improper network boundary enforcement in cloud-native management consoles. Organizations using OpenShift 6.0.0 should be aware that this vulnerability could be used to bypass network controls and access internal services, which may contain sensitive data or management interfaces.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized internal network reconnaissance and potential information disclosure within Kubernetes/OpenShift clusters. Attackers with valid user credentials can exploit the SSRF to reach internal services that are otherwise protected by network segmentation, increasing the attack surface inside the cluster. This could lead to exposure of sensitive configuration data, internal APIs, or metadata services, which may facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation or lateral movement. The impact is particularly significant for organizations relying heavily on OpenShift for critical infrastructure, cloud-native applications, or regulated data processing. While the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, the confidentiality breach could have compliance and operational repercussions. European entities in sectors like finance, healthcare, and government, which often deploy OpenShift clusters, must consider this vulnerability a moderate risk that could be exploited to undermine internal security controls.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict access to the /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint to only trusted and necessary users, ideally limiting it to administrators or removing access entirely if not required. 2. Monitor and log all requests made through this proxy endpoint to detect unusual or suspicious internal network access patterns. 3. Implement network policies within the OpenShift cluster to restrict pod-to-pod communication and limit access to sensitive internal services. 4. Apply any official patches or updates from Red Hat/OpenShift as soon as they become available to address this vulnerability. 5. Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) and strong credential management to reduce the risk of compromised user accounts being used to exploit this SSRF. 6. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on internal service exposure via management consoles. 7. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or API gateways that can filter and validate requests to management endpoints. 8. Educate users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of safeguarding authentication credentials.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy
CVE-2024-6538: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Description
A flaw was found in OpenShift Console. A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack can happen if an attacker supplies all or part of a URL to the server to query. The server is considered to be in a privileged network position and can often reach exposed services that aren't readily available to clients due to network filtering. Leveraging such an attack vector, the attacker can have an impact on other services and potentially disclose information or have other nefarious effects on the system. The /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint on the OpenShift Console allows authenticated users to have the console's pod perform arbitrary and fully controlled HTTP(s) requests. The full response to these requests is returned by the endpoint. While the name of this endpoint suggests the requests are only bound to the internet, no such checks are in place. An authenticated user can therefore ask the console to perform arbitrary HTTP requests from outside the cluster to a service inside the cluster.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-6538 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the OpenShift Console version 6.0.0. The issue resides in the /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint, which is intended to allow the console pod to perform HTTP(S) requests to internet resources. However, the endpoint lacks proper validation and filtering, allowing authenticated users to craft arbitrary URLs, including those targeting internal cluster services that are normally inaccessible due to network segmentation and filtering. Because the OpenShift Console pod operates within a privileged network position inside the cluster, this SSRF flaw can be leveraged to access sensitive internal services, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation. The vulnerability requires the attacker to be authenticated but does not require additional privileges or user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.3, reflecting a medium severity level primarily due to the confidentiality impact and ease of exploitation. There are no known public exploits at this time. The flaw highlights the risk of insufficient input validation and improper network boundary enforcement in cloud-native management consoles. Organizations using OpenShift 6.0.0 should be aware that this vulnerability could be used to bypass network controls and access internal services, which may contain sensitive data or management interfaces.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized internal network reconnaissance and potential information disclosure within Kubernetes/OpenShift clusters. Attackers with valid user credentials can exploit the SSRF to reach internal services that are otherwise protected by network segmentation, increasing the attack surface inside the cluster. This could lead to exposure of sensitive configuration data, internal APIs, or metadata services, which may facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation or lateral movement. The impact is particularly significant for organizations relying heavily on OpenShift for critical infrastructure, cloud-native applications, or regulated data processing. While the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, the confidentiality breach could have compliance and operational repercussions. European entities in sectors like finance, healthcare, and government, which often deploy OpenShift clusters, must consider this vulnerability a moderate risk that could be exploited to undermine internal security controls.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict access to the /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint to only trusted and necessary users, ideally limiting it to administrators or removing access entirely if not required. 2. Monitor and log all requests made through this proxy endpoint to detect unusual or suspicious internal network access patterns. 3. Implement network policies within the OpenShift cluster to restrict pod-to-pod communication and limit access to sensitive internal services. 4. Apply any official patches or updates from Red Hat/OpenShift as soon as they become available to address this vulnerability. 5. Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) and strong credential management to reduce the risk of compromised user accounts being used to exploit this SSRF. 6. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on internal service exposure via management consoles. 7. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or API gateways that can filter and validate requests to management endpoints. 8. Educate users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of safeguarding authentication credentials.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-07-05T21:14:03.063Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d18f64d7c5ea9f4b3d6b2
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 12:06:14 AM
Last enriched: 11/7/2025, 1:49:00 AM
Last updated: 12/2/2025, 4:05:22 AM
Views: 36
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-20792: CWE-617 Reachable Assertion in MediaTek, Inc. MT2735, MT6833, MT6833P, MT6853, MT6853T, MT6855, MT6855T, MT6873, MT6875, MT6875T, MT6877, MT6877T, MT6877TT, MT6880, MT6883, MT6885, MT6889, MT6890, MT6891, MT6893, MT8791T
HighCVE-2025-20791: CWE-617 Reachable Assertion in MediaTek, Inc. MT2735, MT6833, MT6833P, MT6853, MT6853T, MT6855, MT6855T, MT6873, MT6875, MT6875T, MT6877, MT6877T, MT6877TT, MT6880, MT6883, MT6885, MT6889, MT6890, MT6891, MT6893, MT8675, MT8771, MT8791, MT8791T, MT8797
HighCVE-2025-20790: CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference in MediaTek, Inc. MT2735, MT6833, MT6833P, MT6853, MT6853T, MT6855, MT6855T, MT6873, MT6875, MT6875T, MT6877, MT6877T, MT6877TT, MT6880, MT6883, MT6885, MT6889, MT6890, MT6891, MT6893, MT8675, MT8771, MT8791, MT8791T, MT8797
HighCVE-2025-20789: CWE-201 Information Exposure Through Sent Data in MediaTek, Inc. MT6781, MT6833, MT6853, MT6877, MT6893, MT8196
MediumCVE-2025-20788: CWE-1262 Improper Access Control for Register Interface in MediaTek, Inc. MT6991, MT8196
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.