CVE-2024-7383: Improper Certificate Validation
A flaw was found in libnbd. The client did not always correctly verify the NBD server's certificate when using TLS to connect to an NBD server. This issue allows a man-in-the-middle attack on NBD traffic.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-7383 identifies a security vulnerability in libnbd, a library used for Network Block Device (NBD) client implementations. The flaw arises because the libnbd client does not consistently verify the TLS certificate presented by the NBD server during connection establishment. TLS certificate validation is critical to ensure that the client is communicating with a legitimate server and to prevent man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. Due to this improper validation, an attacker positioned between the client and server could intercept, modify, or redirect NBD traffic without detection. This vulnerability affects libnbd versions 1.18.0 and 1.20.0. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.4 indicates a high severity level, with the vector showing network attack vector (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and high impact on confidentiality and integrity (C:H/I:H) but no impact on availability (A:N). The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, making it easier for remote attackers to exploit if they can position themselves on the network path. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the potential for sensitive data exposure or manipulation in environments using libnbd is significant. The flaw is particularly relevant for environments where NBD is used to provide remote block storage over TLS, such as cloud infrastructures, virtualized data centers, or storage clusters. The improper certificate validation undermines the security guarantees of TLS, which is the primary defense against MITM attacks in these scenarios.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-7383 can be substantial, especially for those relying on libnbd for remote block device access in cloud, virtualization, or storage infrastructure. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data transmitted over NBD connections, including potentially critical business or personal information. Integrity of data could also be compromised, allowing attackers to alter data in transit, which could result in corrupted storage volumes or manipulated files. This could disrupt business operations, lead to data breaches, or cause compliance violations under regulations such as GDPR. The vulnerability does not affect availability directly but the indirect consequences of data manipulation or breach could be severe. Given the network-based attack vector and no requirement for authentication, attackers with network access (e.g., via compromised routers, malicious insiders, or network interception points) could exploit this flaw. European cloud service providers, data centers, and enterprises using open-source storage solutions are particularly at risk. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as exploit code could be developed rapidly once the vulnerability is public.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor libnbd project communications and security advisories closely for official patches addressing CVE-2024-7383 and apply them promptly once released. 2. Until patches are available, consider disabling TLS connections to NBD servers or restricting NBD usage to trusted internal networks where MITM risk is minimal. 3. Implement network segmentation and strict access controls to limit exposure of NBD traffic to untrusted networks or users. 4. Use network security tools such as intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor for suspicious MITM activity or anomalous traffic patterns on NBD ports. 5. Enforce strict TLS certificate validation policies on clients and servers, including certificate pinning or using mutually authenticated TLS if supported. 6. Conduct regular audits of network paths and infrastructure to detect potential interception points or rogue devices. 7. Educate system administrators and security teams about the risks of improper certificate validation and the importance of timely patching. 8. Where feasible, consider alternative secure storage protocols or solutions that have robust certificate validation mechanisms until this issue is resolved.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Ireland
CVE-2024-7383: Improper Certificate Validation
Description
A flaw was found in libnbd. The client did not always correctly verify the NBD server's certificate when using TLS to connect to an NBD server. This issue allows a man-in-the-middle attack on NBD traffic.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-7383 identifies a security vulnerability in libnbd, a library used for Network Block Device (NBD) client implementations. The flaw arises because the libnbd client does not consistently verify the TLS certificate presented by the NBD server during connection establishment. TLS certificate validation is critical to ensure that the client is communicating with a legitimate server and to prevent man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. Due to this improper validation, an attacker positioned between the client and server could intercept, modify, or redirect NBD traffic without detection. This vulnerability affects libnbd versions 1.18.0 and 1.20.0. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.4 indicates a high severity level, with the vector showing network attack vector (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and high impact on confidentiality and integrity (C:H/I:H) but no impact on availability (A:N). The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, making it easier for remote attackers to exploit if they can position themselves on the network path. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the potential for sensitive data exposure or manipulation in environments using libnbd is significant. The flaw is particularly relevant for environments where NBD is used to provide remote block storage over TLS, such as cloud infrastructures, virtualized data centers, or storage clusters. The improper certificate validation undermines the security guarantees of TLS, which is the primary defense against MITM attacks in these scenarios.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-7383 can be substantial, especially for those relying on libnbd for remote block device access in cloud, virtualization, or storage infrastructure. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data transmitted over NBD connections, including potentially critical business or personal information. Integrity of data could also be compromised, allowing attackers to alter data in transit, which could result in corrupted storage volumes or manipulated files. This could disrupt business operations, lead to data breaches, or cause compliance violations under regulations such as GDPR. The vulnerability does not affect availability directly but the indirect consequences of data manipulation or breach could be severe. Given the network-based attack vector and no requirement for authentication, attackers with network access (e.g., via compromised routers, malicious insiders, or network interception points) could exploit this flaw. European cloud service providers, data centers, and enterprises using open-source storage solutions are particularly at risk. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as exploit code could be developed rapidly once the vulnerability is public.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor libnbd project communications and security advisories closely for official patches addressing CVE-2024-7383 and apply them promptly once released. 2. Until patches are available, consider disabling TLS connections to NBD servers or restricting NBD usage to trusted internal networks where MITM risk is minimal. 3. Implement network segmentation and strict access controls to limit exposure of NBD traffic to untrusted networks or users. 4. Use network security tools such as intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor for suspicious MITM activity or anomalous traffic patterns on NBD ports. 5. Enforce strict TLS certificate validation policies on clients and servers, including certificate pinning or using mutually authenticated TLS if supported. 6. Conduct regular audits of network paths and infrastructure to detect potential interception points or rogue devices. 7. Educate system administrators and security teams about the risks of improper certificate validation and the importance of timely patching. 8. Where feasible, consider alternative secure storage protocols or solutions that have robust certificate validation mechanisms until this issue is resolved.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-08-01T14:01:54.833Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d46994d7c5ea9f4b40d5e
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 3:20:57 AM
Last enriched: 11/8/2025, 7:47:06 AM
Last updated: 11/29/2025, 12:44:26 AM
Views: 36
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2024-21907: CWE-755 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions
HighCVE-2024-13979: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Hangzhou Shengqiao Technology Co. Ltd. St. Joe ERP System ("圣乔ERP系统")
CriticalCVE-2025-12977: CWE-187: Partial String Comparison in FluentBit Fluent Bit
CriticalCVE-2025-12972: CWE-35: Path Traversal in FluentBit Fluent Bit
MediumCVE-2025-12970: CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in FluentBit Fluent Bit
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.