CVE-2024-8613VulnerabilityPublished 20 Mar 2025Updated 15 Oct 2025

CVE-2024-8613: gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt · Insecure Direct Object Reference

Affects gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgptSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.1 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.0 base score

8.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 48% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Mar 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubgaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt`pkg:github/gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt`Other threats	Affected =20240802	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-8613, organizations should first verify if they are using the affected gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt versions and apply any available patches or updates from the vendor as soon as they are released. In the absence of patches, implement strict access control policies at the application layer, ensuring that session keys or user identifiers are validated against authenticated user identities before granting access to chat histories. Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on session management and authorization logic to identify and remediate similar flaws. Employ network segmentation and restrict access to the chat platform to trusted users and networks only. Enable detailed logging and monitoring of access to chat histories to detect anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. Educate users about the importance of safeguarding their credentials and session tokens. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block unauthorized access patterns. Finally, prepare incident response plans that include procedures for handling data breaches involving chat history exposure or deletion.

Description

A vulnerability in gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt version 20240802 allows attackers to access, copy, and delete other users' chat histories. This issue arises due to improper handling of session data and lack of access control mechanisms, enabling attackers to view and manipulate chat histories of other users.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a serious risk to the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive communications stored within the gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt platform. Unauthorized access to chat histories could lead to data breaches involving personal data, intellectual property, or confidential business information, potentially violating GDPR and other data protection regulations. The ability to delete chat histories also risks loss of critical audit trails and evidence, complicating incident response and compliance efforts. Organizations relying on this platform for internal or customer communications may face reputational damage, legal liabilities, and operational disruptions. The network-based attack vector and low complexity mean that attackers with limited privileges could exploit this vulnerability relatively easily, increasing the threat landscape. Given the increasing use of AI-driven chat platforms in Europe, the impact could extend to sectors such as finance, healthcare, legal, and government, where confidentiality is paramount.

CWE-639Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #24OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
Architecture and Design
For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design
Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Authorization Testing Automation (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V4.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V4.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 15 Oct 2025, 13:19 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-639

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats