Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-0577: Insufficient Entropy

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-0577cvecve-2025-0577
Published: Wed Feb 18 2026 (02/18/2026, 20:25:34 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5

Description

An insufficient entropy vulnerability was found in glibc. The getrandom and arc4random family of functions may return predictable randomness if these functions are called again after the fork, which happens concurrently with a call to any of these functions.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 02/19/2026, 12:01:34 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-0577 identifies an insufficient entropy vulnerability in the GNU C Library (glibc), specifically within the getrandom and arc4random family of functions. These functions are designed to provide cryptographically secure random numbers essential for various security operations, including key generation, nonce creation, and session establishment. The vulnerability arises when these functions are called concurrently after a process fork. Forking creates a child process with a copy of the parent's memory space, including the state of the random number generator. If getrandom or arc4random are invoked simultaneously in both parent and child processes, the entropy pool used to generate randomness may become predictable or insufficiently refreshed, leading to repeated or guessable random outputs. This predictability undermines the cryptographic strength of any security mechanisms relying on these functions, potentially allowing attackers to infer or reproduce random values. The affected versions are Fedora-specific builds of glibc 2.39-28.fc40 and 2.40-12.fc41. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.8, indicating medium severity, with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the flaw poses a risk to confidentiality and integrity in systems that depend on secure randomness. The issue is particularly relevant for server environments and applications that fork processes and rely on glibc randomness for cryptographic operations.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data and cryptographic operations. Systems that rely on glibc's getrandom or arc4random for generating cryptographic keys, session tokens, or nonces may produce predictable values after a fork, increasing the risk of cryptographic attacks such as key recovery or session hijacking. This can affect web servers, VPN gateways, secure communication platforms, and other critical infrastructure components. Although the vulnerability does not impact availability, the potential for data breaches or unauthorized access is significant. Organizations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and government, which handle sensitive personal and financial data, are particularly at risk. The medium severity score reflects the need for timely patching but also indicates that exploitation requires specific conditions (fork concurrency). The absence of known exploits suggests a window for proactive mitigation. Failure to address this issue could lead to erosion of trust, regulatory penalties under GDPR for data breaches, and operational disruptions due to compromised security.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should prioritize updating glibc to patched versions once they are released by Fedora or their Linux distribution maintainers. Until patches are available, developers and system administrators should audit applications to identify and minimize concurrent calls to getrandom or arc4random immediately following a fork. Implementing synchronization mechanisms to serialize random number generation post-fork can reduce the risk. Additionally, consider using alternative entropy sources or cryptographic libraries that do not exhibit this vulnerability. Monitoring system logs for unusual process forking patterns combined with random number generation may help detect attempts to exploit this flaw. Security teams should also review cryptographic key management practices to ensure keys generated during vulnerable periods are rotated or invalidated. Finally, maintain up-to-date inventories of affected systems and apply rigorous testing after updates to confirm the vulnerability is mitigated.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
fedora
Date Reserved
2025-01-19T13:43:18.289Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6996fb458fb9188dea8c0118

Added to database: 2/19/2026, 12:00:05 PM

Last enriched: 2/19/2026, 12:01:34 PM

Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:16:38 AM

Views: 4

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats