CVE-2025-10084VulnerabilityPublished 8 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10084: elunez eladmin · Improper Authorization

Affects elunez eladminSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
elunez eladmin	Affected =2.0 =2.1 =2.2 =2.3 =2.4 =2.5 =2.6 =2.7	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately audit their use of elunez eladmin to identify affected versions (2.0 through 2.7). Until an official patch is released, organizations should restrict access to the eladmin management interface to trusted internal networks or VPNs, employing network segmentation and firewall rules to block unauthorized external access. Implement strict access controls and monitor API endpoint usage for anomalous queries to /api/logs/error/1. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block unauthorized attempts to access the vulnerable endpoint. Regularly review error logs and system alerts for signs of exploitation attempts. Organizations should also engage with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates as soon as they become available and plan timely upgrades. Additionally, consider implementing enhanced logging and alerting on privilege escalation or unusual API access patterns to detect exploitation attempts early.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in elunez eladmin up to 2.7. This affects the function queryErrorLogDetail of the file /api/logs/error/1 of the component SysLogController. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Impact

For European organizations using elunez eladmin versions 2.0 to 2.7, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized disclosure of internal error logs. Such logs may contain sensitive information about system configurations, software versions, or error conditions that could be leveraged by attackers to plan more targeted attacks. While the vulnerability does not directly allow data modification or service disruption, the leakage of diagnostic data can undermine confidentiality and facilitate lateral movement or privilege escalation attempts. Organizations in sectors with strict data protection regulations, such as finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure, could face compliance risks if sensitive information is exposed. Furthermore, the remote exploitability without user interaction increases the threat surface, especially for externally accessible eladmin management interfaces. The absence of known active exploitation reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for future attacks, especially given the availability of public exploit code.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Sep 2025, 06:23 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats