CVE-2025-10086VulnerabilityPublished 8 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10086: fuyang_lipengjun platform · Improper Authorization

Affects fuyang_lipengjun platformSource CVE Database V5

Mentioned vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-9936

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
fuyang_lipengjun platform	Affected =1.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Implement strict access control mechanisms around the /adposition/queryAll endpoint, ensuring that only authorized roles can invoke this function. 2. Conduct a thorough review and audit of all authorization checks within the AdPositionController and related components to identify and remediate similar weaknesses. 3. Employ network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to the platform's management interfaces, limiting exposure to trusted networks or VPNs. 4. Enforce strong authentication and credential management policies to prevent unauthorized privilege acquisition that could be leveraged to exploit this vulnerability. 5. Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual access patterns to the /adposition/queryAll endpoint, enabling early detection of exploitation attempts. 6. Engage with the vendor or development team to obtain or develop patches addressing the improper authorization flaw. 7. If patching is not immediately possible, consider implementing Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block or challenge suspicious requests targeting the vulnerable endpoint. 8. Educate internal teams about the importance of least privilege principles and regularly review user permissions to minimize the risk of privilege escalation.

Description

A weakness has been identified in fuyang_lipengjun platform 1.0.0. This issue affects the function queryAll of the file /adposition/queryAll of the component AdPositionController. This manipulation causes improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. Affects another part than CVE-2025-9936.

Impact

For European organizations using the fuyang_lipengjun platform version 1.0.0, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to advertising position data or related business information managed by the platform. While the direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is assessed as low, the improper authorization could be exploited to gain insights into internal configurations or data flows, which might be leveraged in targeted attacks or competitive espionage. Organizations in sectors relying heavily on digital advertising or marketing platforms could face operational disruptions or reputational damage if sensitive data is exposed. Additionally, unauthorized access could contravene GDPR requirements concerning data protection and access controls, potentially resulting in regulatory scrutiny or fines. The remote exploitability and lack of user interaction requirements increase the risk of automated scanning and exploitation attempts, especially if the platform is internet-facing. However, the requirement for low privileges means that attackers must first gain some level of access, which may limit the scope of impact to organizations with weak internal access controls or exposed credentials.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Sep 2025, 06:16 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats