CVE-2025-10591VulnerabilityPublished 17 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10591: Portabilis i-Educar · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Portabilis i-EducarSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Portabilis i-Educar	Affected =2.0 =2.1 =2.2 =2.3 =2.4 =2.5 =2.6 =2.7 =2.8 =2.9 =2.10	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations using i-Educar should prioritize the following actions: 1) Apply patches or updates from Portabilis as soon as they become available. 2) Implement web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules specifically designed to detect and block XSS payloads targeting the vulnerable parameters ('abreviatura' and 'tipoacao'). 3) Conduct input validation and sanitization on all user inputs at the application level, ensuring that special characters and scripts are properly escaped or removed. 4) Educate users and administrators about the risks of XSS attacks and encourage cautious behavior when interacting with links or inputs within the i-Educar platform. 5) Restrict access to the intranet and administrative pages to trusted networks and authenticated users only, reducing exposure to remote attackers. 6) Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. 7) Consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts within the application context. These measures, combined, will reduce the attack surface and limit the potential impact of this vulnerability.

Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. This affects an unknown function of the file /intranet/educar_funcao_cad.php of the component Editar Função Page. This manipulation of the argument abreviatura/tipoacao causes cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly educational institutions using Portabilis i-Educar, this vulnerability poses a risk to the confidentiality and integrity of user data and session information. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive student and staff information, manipulation of academic records, or disruption of administrative processes. Given the remote exploitability and public availability of exploit code, attackers could target vulnerable installations to conduct phishing, credential theft, or lateral movement within the network. The impact is heightened in Europe due to strict data protection regulations such as GDPR, where unauthorized data access or leakage could result in significant legal and financial penalties. Additionally, the educational sector is increasingly targeted by cybercriminals for espionage or disruption, making this vulnerability a potential vector for broader attacks. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should be addressed promptly to prevent exploitation and maintain trust in educational digital services.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Sep 2025, 11:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats