CVE-2025-10618VulnerabilityPublished 17 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10618: itsourcecode Online Clinic Management System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Online Clinic Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 41% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecode Online Clinic Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European healthcare organizations using this system should immediately conduct a thorough security assessment of their Online Clinic Management System installations. Specific mitigations include: 1) Implementing strict input validation and parameterized queries or prepared statements in the transact.php file and other affected modules to prevent SQL injection. 2) Applying web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the 'firstname' parameter and similar inputs. 3) Restricting database user privileges to the minimum necessary to limit the impact of potential SQL injection exploits. 4) Monitoring logs for unusual database query patterns or failed injection attempts to enable early detection. 5) Isolating the clinic management system behind secure network segments and VPNs to reduce exposure. 6) Engaging with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates as soon as they become available. 7) Conducting regular security training for developers and administrators on secure coding and input validation best practices. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on immediate containment, detection, and hardening specific to the known vulnerable parameter and the healthcare context.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in itsourcecode Online Clinic Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file transact.php. Such manipulation of the argument firstname leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Other parameters might be affected as well.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly healthcare providers using the itsourcecode Online Clinic Management System 1.0, this vulnerability poses significant risks. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive patient health information, violating GDPR requirements and potentially resulting in substantial regulatory fines and reputational damage. Data integrity could be compromised, leading to incorrect patient records, which may adversely affect patient care and safety. Availability impacts could disrupt clinical operations, causing delays in treatment and administrative processes. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the likelihood of attacks, especially in environments with internet-facing clinic management portals. Given the criticality of healthcare services, any disruption or data breach could have severe consequences for patient trust and organizational compliance within the European healthcare sector.

Summary

CVE-2025-10618 is a medium severity SQL Injection vulnerability identified in version 1.0 of the itsourcecode Online Clinic Management System, specifically within the transact.php file. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization or validation of the 'firstname' parameter, which can be manipulated by an attacker to inject malicious SQL code. This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attacker with low privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the backend database without requiring user interaction. The vulnerability potentially compromises the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system's data, as attackers could extract sensitive patient information, modify records, or disrupt service operations. Although the CVSS score is 5.3, indicating a medium severity, the presence of remote exploitability and the critical nature of healthcare data elevate the risk profile. The vulnerability may also affect other parameters beyond 'firstname,' suggesting a broader input validation issue within the application. No patches or fixes have been published yet, and no known exploits are currently observed in the wild, but public disclosure increases the risk of exploitation attempts. The Online Clinic Management System is likely used by healthcare providers to manage patient records, appointments, and transactions, making the system a high-value target for attackers seeking to access sensitive medical data or disrupt healthcare services.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 25 Sep 2025, 00:42 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats