VulnerabilityPublished 18 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10632: itsourcecode Online Petshop Management System · Cross-site Scripting

Affects itsourcecode Online Petshop Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecode Online Petshop Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Since no official patches are currently available, European organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. These include: 1) Applying strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially the 'name/address' fields in the Admin Dashboard, to neutralize malicious scripts. 2) Restricting access to the Admin Dashboard via network segmentation, VPNs, or IP whitelisting to limit exposure to trusted users only. 3) Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block typical XSS attack patterns targeting the vulnerable parameter. 4) Enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative accounts to reduce the impact of session hijacking. 5) Monitoring logs for suspicious activity related to the availableframe.php endpoint and anomalous input patterns. 6) Educating administrators and users about phishing risks and signs of XSS exploitation. 7) Planning for an upgrade or migration to a patched or alternative system version once available. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable component and attack vectors.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Online Petshop Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file availableframe.php of the component Admin Dashboard. The manipulation of the argument name/address results in cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations utilizing the itsourcecode Online Petshop Management System 1.0, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the confidentiality and integrity of administrative sessions and data. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to hijack admin sessions, manipulate petshop management data, or conduct phishing attacks targeting internal users. Given that the system is used for managing petshop operations, the direct impact on critical infrastructure is limited; however, compromised credentials or session data could be leveraged for broader network access or lateral movement within an organization. Additionally, exploitation could damage the organization's reputation and customer trust, especially if customer data is exposed or manipulated. The medium severity indicates a moderate risk, but the ease of remote exploitation without authentication means organizations should not underestimate the threat. European organizations with online petshop management operations or those using this specific software version are at risk, particularly if the system is accessible from the internet or internal networks without adequate protections.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Sep 2025, 13:38 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats