VulnerabilityPublished 19 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10708: Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform · Path Traversal

Affects Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization PlatformSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 61% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. First, restrict external access to the affected endpoints (/history/historyDownload.do and usrlogout.do) by implementing network-level controls such as firewalls or VPNs to limit access to trusted users and systems only. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block path traversal patterns in the 'fileName' parameter. Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on the server side to reject any file paths containing traversal sequences (e.g., '../'). Monitor server logs for suspicious access patterns indicative of path traversal attempts. If possible, isolate the affected platform within a segmented network zone to reduce the blast radius of a potential compromise. Organizations should also engage with Four-Faith to demand timely patch releases and consider alternative solutions if vendor support remains absent. Regular backups and incident response plans should be updated to address potential data exposure scenarios related to this vulnerability.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /history/historyDownload.do;usrlogout.do. The manipulation of the argument fileName leads to path traversal. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations utilizing the Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality of critical infrastructure data. Unauthorized file access could reveal sensitive operational information, configuration details, or credentials, which adversaries could leverage for further attacks or espionage. Although the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, the exposure of sensitive data could undermine trust in water management systems and lead to regulatory compliance issues under GDPR if personal or sensitive data is involved. Additionally, attackers could use the information gained to plan more sophisticated attacks targeting water infrastructure, which is a critical sector in Europe. The lack of vendor response and absence of patches exacerbate the risk, especially for organizations that have not implemented compensating controls. The threat is particularly relevant for European countries with significant deployments of Four-Faith products or those with strategic water management infrastructure that could be targeted for disruption or intelligence gathering.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Sep 2025, 13:22 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats