Skip to main content

CVE-2025-10745: CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values in specialk Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-10745cvecve-2025-10745cwe-330
Published: Fri Sep 26 2025 (09/26/2025, 03:25:34 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: specialk
Product: Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots

Description

The Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blocking Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.8. This is due to a site-wide “secret key” being deterministically generated from a constant character set using md5() and base64_encode() and then stored in the `banhammer_secret_key` option. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the plugin’s logging and blocking by appending a GET parameter named `banhammer-process_{SECRET}` where `{SECRET}` is the predictable value, thereby causing Banhammer to abort its protections for that request.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 09/26/2025, 04:01:13 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-10745 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the WordPress plugin 'Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots' developed by specialk. The vulnerability arises from the use of insufficiently random values in generating a site-wide secret key. Specifically, the plugin deterministically generates this secret key from a constant character set using the md5() hashing function combined with base64 encoding, and stores it in the 'banhammer_secret_key' option. Because the secret key is predictable, unauthenticated attackers can bypass the plugin's logging and blocking mechanisms by appending a GET parameter named 'banhammer-process_{SECRET}' to their requests, where {SECRET} is the predictable secret key. This causes Banhammer to abort its protections for that request, effectively allowing malicious users or bots to evade detection and blocking. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 3.4.8. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium), with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), no confidentiality impact (C:N), low integrity impact (I:L), and no availability impact (A:N). There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no patches have been linked yet. The root cause is classified under CWE-330, which refers to the use of insufficiently random values in security-critical contexts.

Potential Impact

For European organizations using the Banhammer plugin on WordPress sites, this vulnerability undermines the effectiveness of a key security control designed to monitor and block malicious traffic, including bad users and bots. Attackers can bypass logging and blocking, potentially enabling them to conduct reconnaissance, brute force attacks, or other malicious activities without detection. This could lead to increased risk of unauthorized access attempts, data scraping, or denial of service conditions if attackers flood the site with malicious requests. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, the integrity of the site's security posture is weakened, increasing the likelihood of further exploitation or compromise. Organizations relying on Banhammer for bot mitigation and traffic monitoring may experience reduced visibility into malicious activity, complicating incident response and threat hunting efforts. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe, especially among small and medium enterprises and public sector websites, the impact could be significant if exploited at scale.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately assess their exposure by identifying WordPress instances running the Banhammer plugin version 3.4.8 or earlier. Until an official patch is released, administrators should consider disabling the plugin or replacing it with alternative, more secure bot management solutions. If disabling is not feasible, organizations should implement additional web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block requests containing the 'banhammer-process_' GET parameter pattern. Monitoring web server logs for suspicious requests that include this parameter can help identify attempted bypasses. Furthermore, organizations should advocate for the plugin vendor to update the secret key generation mechanism to use cryptographically secure random functions (e.g., PHP's random_bytes) rather than md5 and base64 encoding of a constant character set. Applying principle of least privilege to WordPress user roles and ensuring all other security best practices are in place will also help mitigate potential downstream risks. Regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on plugin vulnerabilities are recommended to detect similar issues proactively.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-09-19T19:27:00.940Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68d60d329e21be37e93b4706

Added to database: 9/26/2025, 3:49:06 AM

Last enriched: 9/26/2025, 4:01:13 AM

Last updated: 9/26/2025, 4:28:05 AM

Views: 4

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats