CVE-2025-10745: CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values in specialk Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots
The Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blocking Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.8. This is due to a site-wide “secret key” being deterministically generated from a constant character set using md5() and base64_encode() and then stored in the `banhammer_secret_key` option. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the plugin’s logging and blocking by appending a GET parameter named `banhammer-process_{SECRET}` where `{SECRET}` is the predictable value, thereby causing Banhammer to abort its protections for that request.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-10745 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the WordPress plugin 'Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots' developed by specialk. The vulnerability arises from the use of insufficiently random values in generating a site-wide secret key. Specifically, the plugin deterministically generates this secret key from a constant character set using the md5() hashing function combined with base64 encoding, and stores it in the 'banhammer_secret_key' option. Because the secret key is predictable, unauthenticated attackers can bypass the plugin's logging and blocking mechanisms by appending a GET parameter named 'banhammer-process_{SECRET}' to their requests, where {SECRET} is the predictable secret key. This causes Banhammer to abort its protections for that request, effectively allowing malicious users or bots to evade detection and blocking. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 3.4.8. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium), with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), no confidentiality impact (C:N), low integrity impact (I:L), and no availability impact (A:N). There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no patches have been linked yet. The root cause is classified under CWE-330, which refers to the use of insufficiently random values in security-critical contexts.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using the Banhammer plugin on WordPress sites, this vulnerability undermines the effectiveness of a key security control designed to monitor and block malicious traffic, including bad users and bots. Attackers can bypass logging and blocking, potentially enabling them to conduct reconnaissance, brute force attacks, or other malicious activities without detection. This could lead to increased risk of unauthorized access attempts, data scraping, or denial of service conditions if attackers flood the site with malicious requests. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, the integrity of the site's security posture is weakened, increasing the likelihood of further exploitation or compromise. Organizations relying on Banhammer for bot mitigation and traffic monitoring may experience reduced visibility into malicious activity, complicating incident response and threat hunting efforts. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe, especially among small and medium enterprises and public sector websites, the impact could be significant if exploited at scale.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately assess their exposure by identifying WordPress instances running the Banhammer plugin version 3.4.8 or earlier. Until an official patch is released, administrators should consider disabling the plugin or replacing it with alternative, more secure bot management solutions. If disabling is not feasible, organizations should implement additional web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block requests containing the 'banhammer-process_' GET parameter pattern. Monitoring web server logs for suspicious requests that include this parameter can help identify attempted bypasses. Furthermore, organizations should advocate for the plugin vendor to update the secret key generation mechanism to use cryptographically secure random functions (e.g., PHP's random_bytes) rather than md5 and base64 encoding of a constant character set. Applying principle of least privilege to WordPress user roles and ensuring all other security best practices are in place will also help mitigate potential downstream risks. Regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on plugin vulnerabilities are recommended to detect similar issues proactively.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Austria
CVE-2025-10745: CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values in specialk Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots
Description
The Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blocking Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.8. This is due to a site-wide “secret key” being deterministically generated from a constant character set using md5() and base64_encode() and then stored in the `banhammer_secret_key` option. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass the plugin’s logging and blocking by appending a GET parameter named `banhammer-process_{SECRET}` where `{SECRET}` is the predictable value, thereby causing Banhammer to abort its protections for that request.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-10745 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the WordPress plugin 'Banhammer – Monitor Site Traffic, Block Bad Users and Bots' developed by specialk. The vulnerability arises from the use of insufficiently random values in generating a site-wide secret key. Specifically, the plugin deterministically generates this secret key from a constant character set using the md5() hashing function combined with base64 encoding, and stores it in the 'banhammer_secret_key' option. Because the secret key is predictable, unauthenticated attackers can bypass the plugin's logging and blocking mechanisms by appending a GET parameter named 'banhammer-process_{SECRET}' to their requests, where {SECRET} is the predictable secret key. This causes Banhammer to abort its protections for that request, effectively allowing malicious users or bots to evade detection and blocking. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 3.4.8. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium), with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), no confidentiality impact (C:N), low integrity impact (I:L), and no availability impact (A:N). There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no patches have been linked yet. The root cause is classified under CWE-330, which refers to the use of insufficiently random values in security-critical contexts.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using the Banhammer plugin on WordPress sites, this vulnerability undermines the effectiveness of a key security control designed to monitor and block malicious traffic, including bad users and bots. Attackers can bypass logging and blocking, potentially enabling them to conduct reconnaissance, brute force attacks, or other malicious activities without detection. This could lead to increased risk of unauthorized access attempts, data scraping, or denial of service conditions if attackers flood the site with malicious requests. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, the integrity of the site's security posture is weakened, increasing the likelihood of further exploitation or compromise. Organizations relying on Banhammer for bot mitigation and traffic monitoring may experience reduced visibility into malicious activity, complicating incident response and threat hunting efforts. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe, especially among small and medium enterprises and public sector websites, the impact could be significant if exploited at scale.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately assess their exposure by identifying WordPress instances running the Banhammer plugin version 3.4.8 or earlier. Until an official patch is released, administrators should consider disabling the plugin or replacing it with alternative, more secure bot management solutions. If disabling is not feasible, organizations should implement additional web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block requests containing the 'banhammer-process_' GET parameter pattern. Monitoring web server logs for suspicious requests that include this parameter can help identify attempted bypasses. Furthermore, organizations should advocate for the plugin vendor to update the secret key generation mechanism to use cryptographically secure random functions (e.g., PHP's random_bytes) rather than md5 and base64 encoding of a constant character set. Applying principle of least privilege to WordPress user roles and ensuring all other security best practices are in place will also help mitigate potential downstream risks. Regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on plugin vulnerabilities are recommended to detect similar issues proactively.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-19T19:27:00.940Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68d60d329e21be37e93b4706
Added to database: 9/26/2025, 3:49:06 AM
Last enriched: 9/26/2025, 4:01:13 AM
Last updated: 9/26/2025, 4:28:05 AM
Views: 4
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9490: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in danieliser Popup Maker – Boost Sales, Conversions, Optins, Subscribers with the Ultimate WP Popups Builder
MediumCVE-2025-10747: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in gamerz WP-DownloadManager
HighCVE-2025-9985: CWE-532 Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File in marceljm Featured Image from URL (FIFU)
MediumCVE-2025-9984: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in marceljm Featured Image from URL (FIFU)
MediumCVE-2025-10037: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in marceljm Featured Image from URL (FIFU)
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.