CVE-2025-10778VulnerabilityPublished 22 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10778: Smartstore · Race Condition

Affects SmartstoreSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.3 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

2.3Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: The successful attack depends on the evasion or circumvention of security-enhancing techniques in place that would otherwise hinder the attack. These include: Evasion of exploit mitigation techniques, for example, circumvention of address space randomization (ASLR) or data execution prevention (DEP) must be performed for the attack to be successful; Obtaining target-specific secrets. The attacker must gather some target-specific secret before the attack can be successful. A secret is any piece of information that cannot be obtained through any amount of reconnaissance. To obtain the secret the attacker must perform additional attacks or break otherwise secure measures (e.g. knowledge of a secret key may be needed to break a crypto channel). This operation must be performed for each attacked target.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 22 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Smartstore	Affected =6.0 =6.1 =6.2.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should implement specific mitigations beyond generic advice: 1) Monitor and restrict concurrent checkout requests involving gift vouchers to prevent race conditions, possibly by introducing server-side locking or transaction serialization mechanisms during voucher validation and redemption. 2) Employ application-level input validation and rate limiting to reduce the likelihood of automated or rapid repeated requests that could trigger the race condition. 3) Conduct thorough code reviews and testing focused on concurrency handling in the Gift Voucher Handler component, especially around the /checkout/confirm/ endpoint. 4) If feasible, temporarily disable or restrict gift voucher functionality until a vendor patch or official fix is available. 5) Implement enhanced logging and anomaly detection to identify suspicious voucher redemption patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 6) Engage with Smartstore support channels or community forums to track updates or unofficial patches addressing this vulnerability. 7) Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious concurrent requests targeting the vulnerable endpoint.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in Smartstore up to 6.2.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /checkout/confirm/ of the component Gift Voucher Handler. The manipulation leads to race condition. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is described as difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using Smartstore e-commerce platforms, this vulnerability could lead to potential manipulation of gift voucher processing during checkout, possibly allowing attackers to exploit timing issues to gain unauthorized benefits such as double redemption or bypassing voucher restrictions. While the direct impact on confidentiality and availability is minimal, the integrity of transaction processing could be compromised, potentially resulting in financial losses or customer trust degradation. Given the low severity and high exploitation complexity, the immediate risk is limited; however, organizations in sectors with high e-commerce transaction volumes, such as retail and hospitality, should be cautious. The lack of vendor response and absence of patches increase the risk of future exploitation attempts if attackers develop reliable exploit techniques. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as part of a multi-stage attack chain targeting payment or order processing systems, which are critical for business operations in Europe.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…