CVE-2025-10782VulnerabilityPublished 22 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10782: Campcodes Online Learning Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Online Learning Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 22 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Online Learning Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately conduct an inventory to identify any deployments of Campcodes LMS version 1.0. In the absence of an official patch, the following specific mitigations are recommended: 1) Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'class_name' parameter at the web application firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy level to block SQL injection payloads. 2) Employ parameterized queries or prepared statements if source code access and modification are possible to remediate the root cause. 3) Restrict administrative interface access to trusted IP addresses or via VPN to reduce exposure. 4) Monitor web server and database logs for unusual query patterns or injection attempts targeting 'class_name'. 5) Conduct regular backups of LMS data to enable recovery in case of data tampering. 6) Consider isolating the LMS environment within a segmented network zone with strict egress and ingress filtering. 7) Educate administrators about the vulnerability and encourage prompt reporting of suspicious activity. 8) Engage with the vendor for updates or patches and plan for an upgrade path to a secure LMS version once available.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Online Learning Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/class.php. Performing manipulation of the argument class_name results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations, especially educational institutions, training providers, and corporate learning departments using Campcodes LMS 1.0, this vulnerability poses a tangible threat to data confidentiality and integrity. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of student or employee information, manipulation of course content or grades, and disruption of learning services. Such incidents could result in regulatory non-compliance under GDPR due to personal data breaches, reputational damage, and operational downtime. The remote, unauthenticated nature of the attack vector increases the likelihood of exploitation attempts, particularly in environments where the LMS is internet-facing without adequate network segmentation or web application firewalls. Additionally, the lack of patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls, which may not fully mitigate risk. The medium severity rating indicates that while the vulnerability is serious, it may not lead to full system compromise or widespread service outages, but targeted data breaches or localized disruptions remain probable.

Summary

CVE-2025-10782 is a SQL Injection vulnerability identified in version 1.0 of the Campcodes Online Learning Management System (LMS). The flaw resides in an unspecified function within the /admin/class.php file, where improper sanitization or validation of the 'class_name' parameter allows an attacker to inject malicious SQL code. This vulnerability is remotely exploitable without requiring authentication or user interaction, as indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N). Exploiting this flaw could enable an attacker to manipulate backend database queries, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, data modification, or even deletion. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 6.9 classifies this as a medium severity issue, reflecting a significant risk but with some limitations in impact scope (low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts). The vulnerability is publicly known, and although no confirmed exploits in the wild have been reported yet, the public availability of exploit code increases the risk of exploitation. The absence of available patches or mitigation links suggests that users of Campcodes LMS 1.0 must proactively implement defensive measures to reduce exposure. Given the LMS context, the vulnerability could compromise sensitive educational data, user credentials, and institutional records if exploited.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 22 Sep 2025, 04:36 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats