VulnerabilityPublished 23 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10837: code-projects Simple Food Ordering System · Cross-site Scripting

Affects code-projects Simple Food Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
code-projects Simple Food Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. First, input validation and output encoding should be enforced on the 'ID' parameter in /ordersimple/order.php to neutralize malicious scripts. If source code access is available, developers should sanitize inputs using established libraries or frameworks that prevent XSS. Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block suspicious payloads targeting this parameter. Organizations should also conduct security awareness training to educate users about the risks of clicking untrusted links. Monitoring web server logs for unusual requests to the vulnerable endpoint can help detect exploitation attempts. Where feasible, consider isolating or replacing the vulnerable system with a more secure alternative. Regular vulnerability scanning and penetration testing should be employed to verify the effectiveness of mitigations. Finally, organizations should stay alert for vendor updates or community patches addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Simple Food Ordering System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /ordersimple/order.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using the Simple Food Ordering System 1.0, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the confidentiality and integrity of user sessions and data. Attackers could exploit the XSS flaw to steal session cookies, perform actions on behalf of legitimate users, or redirect users to malicious sites. This could lead to data breaches involving customer information, financial fraud, or reputational damage. Since the affected software is a food ordering system, organizations in the hospitality and food service sectors are particularly at risk. The impact is heightened in Europe due to strict data protection regulations such as GDPR, where unauthorized disclosure of personal data can result in significant fines and legal consequences. Additionally, the medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it is exploitable remotely and can be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, but the public disclosure means attackers could develop exploits rapidly. Organizations relying on this system should consider the potential for targeted phishing campaigns or web-based attacks exploiting this vulnerability.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Sep 2025, 14:02 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats