CVE-2025-11102VulnerabilityPublished 28 Sep 2025Updated 29 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-11102: Campcodes Online Learning Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Online Learning Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 35% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 28 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Online Learning Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediately restrict external access to the /admin/edit_content.php interface by implementing network-level controls such as VPNs, IP whitelisting, or firewall rules to limit exposure. 2. Apply input validation and sanitization on the 'Title' parameter, ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly escaped or handled using parameterized queries (prepared statements) to prevent SQL injection. 3. If a vendor patch becomes available, prioritize its deployment after testing in a controlled environment. 4. Conduct a thorough security review of the entire LMS codebase to identify and remediate similar injection flaws. 5. Implement web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules specifically designed to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting this vulnerability. 6. Monitor logs for unusual database queries or repeated failed attempts to manipulate the 'Title' parameter. 7. Educate administrators on the risks of exposing administrative interfaces publicly and enforce strong authentication and session management practices. 8. Regularly back up LMS data and verify the integrity of backups to enable recovery in case of a successful attack. 9. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) tools to detect and block injection attacks in real time. 10. Engage in threat intelligence sharing with other educational institutions to stay informed about emerging exploitation trends related to this vulnerability.

Description

A weakness has been identified in Campcodes Online Learning Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/edit_content.php. Executing manipulation of the argument Title can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly educational institutions and training providers using Campcodes LMS 1.0, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive educational data, including student records, course materials, and administrative credentials. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized data disclosure, data tampering, or denial of service by corrupting the database. This could disrupt educational operations, damage institutional reputation, and potentially violate data protection regulations such as GDPR if personal data is exposed. The remote, unauthenticated nature of the attack increases the likelihood of exploitation, especially in environments where the LMS admin interface is accessible over the internet without adequate network segmentation or access controls. Additionally, the availability of a public exploit lowers the barrier for attackers, including cybercriminals and hacktivists, to target vulnerable systems. The impact extends beyond data loss to potential compliance violations and financial penalties. Organizations relying on this LMS should consider the risk of lateral movement within their networks if attackers gain a foothold through this vulnerability.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 6 Oct 2025, 00:31 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats