Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-11268: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in wpchill Strong Testimonials

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-11268cvecve-2025-11268cwe-79
Published: Thu Nov 06 2025 (11/06/2025, 08:26:27 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: wpchill
Product: Strong Testimonials

Description

The Strong Testimonials plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.16. This is due to the software allowing users to submit a testimonial in which a value is not properly validated or sanitized prior to being passed to a do_shortcode call. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes if an administrator previews or publishes a crafted testimonial.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/13/2025, 09:47:20 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-11268 is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability categorized under CWE-79, found in the Strong Testimonials plugin for WordPress developed by wpchill. The flaw arises from improper neutralization of input during web page generation, specifically due to the plugin allowing users to submit testimonials containing unsanitized values that are passed directly to the WordPress do_shortcode function. This function processes shortcodes embedded in content, and because the input is not validated or sanitized, attackers can inject arbitrary shortcodes. The vulnerability affects all versions of the plugin up to and including 3.2.16. An unauthenticated attacker can submit a malicious testimonial, but exploitation requires an administrator to preview or publish the testimonial, which triggers the execution of the injected shortcode. This can lead to unauthorized actions or code execution within the context of the WordPress site, potentially compromising the integrity of the site content or functionality. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3 (medium), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based with low complexity and no privileges required, but user interaction (admin preview/publish) is necessary. There is no direct impact on confidentiality or availability, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild as of the publication date. The vulnerability highlights the risks of insufficient input validation in WordPress plugins that leverage shortcode processing.

Potential Impact

For European organizations using WordPress sites with the Strong Testimonials plugin, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the integrity of website content and functionality. An attacker could inject malicious shortcodes that execute arbitrary actions when an administrator interacts with the testimonial, potentially leading to unauthorized changes, defacement, or further exploitation if the shortcode payload is crafted to escalate privileges or manipulate site behavior. While confidentiality and availability impacts are not directly indicated, the integrity compromise could undermine trust in the organization's web presence and potentially facilitate further attacks. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on WordPress for customer engagement, such as e-commerce, media, and public services, may face reputational damage or operational disruption. The requirement for administrator interaction limits the immediacy of exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with multiple administrators or less stringent content review processes.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately verify if their WordPress installations use the Strong Testimonials plugin and identify the plugin version. Since no official patch links are provided, organizations should monitor the vendor’s announcements for updates or patches addressing CVE-2025-11268. In the interim, administrators should restrict testimonial submissions to trusted users or disable the testimonial submission feature to prevent unauthenticated input. Implementing a web application firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block suspicious shortcode patterns in testimonial submissions can provide additional protection. Administrators should exercise caution when previewing or publishing testimonials, ideally reviewing raw input for suspicious content. Regular security audits of WordPress plugins and limiting administrative privileges to essential personnel will reduce the risk of exploitation. Finally, organizations should consider isolating WordPress environments and maintaining up-to-date backups to enable rapid recovery if exploitation occurs.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-10-03T19:03:57.976Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 690c621403d968117476fb98

Added to database: 11/6/2025, 8:53:40 AM

Last enriched: 11/13/2025, 9:47:20 AM

Last updated: 12/19/2025, 7:33:44 PM

Views: 81

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats