VulnerabilityPublished 5 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-11308: Vanderlande Baggage 360 · Cross-site Scripting

Affects Vanderlande Baggage 360Source CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Vanderlande Baggage 360	Affected =7.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

2) Implement strict input validation and output encoding on any user-controllable inputs in the baggage system interface, if customization or integration options exist. 3) Restrict access to the vulnerable API endpoint to trusted internal networks only, using network segmentation and access control lists to limit exposure. 4) Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual activity or repeated attempts to exploit the Message parameter. 5) Educate staff and users about the risks of interacting with suspicious links or inputs related to the baggage system interface to reduce successful user interaction exploitation. 6) Consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts in the web interface. 7) Engage with Vanderlande for updates and push for timely patch release. 8) Evaluate alternative baggage handling solutions or temporary compensating controls if feasible. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable endpoint and operational context.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Vanderlande Baggage 360 7.0.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api-addons/v1/messages. Such manipulation of the argument Message leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly airports and logistics operators using Vanderlande Baggage 360, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to operational integrity and security. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary scripts within the baggage handling management interface, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized access to sensitive operational data, or manipulation of baggage handling workflows. This could disrupt airport operations, cause delays, or facilitate further attacks on connected systems. Given the critical nature of airport infrastructure in Europe and the reliance on automated baggage systems, the impact could extend to passenger safety and trust. Additionally, attackers could leverage this vulnerability to pivot into broader network segments, compromising confidentiality and availability of other systems. The lack of vendor response and patch increases the window of exposure, making European airports attractive targets for opportunistic attackers or advanced persistent threat groups aiming to disrupt critical infrastructure.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…