VulnerabilityPublished 6 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-11337: Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform · Path Traversal

Affects Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization PlatformSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 12:54 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 52% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 6 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform	Affected =2.0 =2.1 =2.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediately restrict external network access to the affected endpoints (/aloneReport/download.do and othersusrlogout.do) using network segmentation or firewall rules.
Deploy a web application firewall (WAF) with rules specifically designed to detect and block path traversal attempts, including suspicious fileName parameter values containing ../ sequences.
Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the fileName parameter to reject any directory traversal characters or patterns.
Conduct thorough audits of server file permissions to ensure that the web application user has minimal access rights, limiting exposure if traversal occurs.
Monitor web server logs for unusual access patterns or attempts to access sensitive files.
If possible, isolate the affected platform in a controlled environment until a vendor patch or official fix is available.
Engage with Four-Faith or third-party security providers to develop or request patches or mitigations.
Educate operational staff about the vulnerability and potential indicators of compromise.
Consider deploying intrusion detection systems (IDS) tuned to detect path traversal exploits targeting this platform.
Plan for incident response readiness in case exploitation attempts are detected.

Description

A vulnerability was detected in Four-Faith Water Conservancy Informatization Platform up to 2.2. This affects an unknown part of the file /aloneReport/index.do/../../aloneReport/download.do;othersusrlogout.do. Performing manipulation of the argument fileName results in path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those involved in water management, infrastructure, and critical utilities, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data disclosure. Exposure of sensitive files could lead to leakage of operational data, system configurations, or credentials, potentially enabling further compromise or disruption of water conservancy operations. Given the critical nature of water infrastructure, any compromise could affect service availability indirectly or enable sabotage. The lack of authentication and ease of exploitation increase the threat level. Additionally, the vendor's non-responsiveness and absence of patches mean organizations must rely on their own mitigations, increasing operational risk. This vulnerability could also be leveraged by nation-state actors or cybercriminals targeting European critical infrastructure, especially in countries with advanced water management digital systems. The impact on confidentiality is partial but significant, while integrity and availability impacts are indirect but possible through chained attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 6 Oct 2025, 13:44 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats