VulnerabilityPublished 8 Oct 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-11506: PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System · SQL Injection

Affects PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 35% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System	Affected =1.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Monitor for official patches or updates from PHPGurukul and apply them immediately once available. 2. Until patches are released, implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'searchdata' parameter, preferably using prepared statements or parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection. 3. Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) configured to detect and block SQL injection payloads targeting the vulnerable endpoint. 4. Restrict access to the /admin/search-appointment.php page to trusted IP addresses or VPN users to reduce exposure. 5. Conduct regular security audits and code reviews of customizations or integrations involving the affected system. 6. Maintain regular backups of the database to enable recovery in case of data tampering or loss. 7. Educate staff about the risks and signs of exploitation to enable early detection and response.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System 1.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /admin/search-appointment.php. The manipulation of the argument searchdata results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Impact

The impact of this vulnerability includes unauthorized access to sensitive customer and business data stored in the backend database, such as appointment details, personal information, and possibly payment data if stored. Attackers could manipulate or delete records, leading to data integrity issues and operational disruption. The availability of the system could be affected if attackers execute commands that cause database crashes or lockouts. Since the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication, attackers can launch attacks at scale, potentially affecting multiple organizations using this software. This could lead to reputational damage, regulatory penalties for data breaches, and financial losses. The niche nature of the software limits the global scale but does not diminish the severity for affected entities, especially small to medium businesses in the beauty and wellness sector that rely heavily on this system for daily operations.

Summary

CVE-2025-11506 identifies a SQL Injection vulnerability in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System version 1.1, specifically in the /admin/search-appointment.php script. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization of the 'searchdata' parameter, which is directly used in SQL queries without adequate validation or parameterization. This allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands, potentially extracting sensitive information, modifying database contents, or disrupting service availability. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction, making it remotely exploitable over the network. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9 (medium severity), reflecting the ease of exploitation and moderate impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no active exploitation has been reported, a public exploit is available, increasing the likelihood of attacks. The affected product is niche software used primarily in beauty parlour management, which may limit the scope but still poses significant risks to organizations relying on this system for appointment scheduling and customer data management. The lack of official patches at the time of disclosure necessitates immediate mitigation through alternative controls.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:00 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats