CVE-2025-11599VulnerabilityPublished 11 Oct 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-11599: Campcodes Online Apartment Visitor Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Online Apartment Visitor Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Online Apartment Visitor Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Since no official patches are currently available, organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. These include deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the /forgot-password.php endpoint and the email parameter. Input validation and sanitization should be enforced at the application level, ideally by updating or rewriting the vulnerable component to use parameterized queries or prepared statements. Network segmentation should isolate the visitor management system from critical infrastructure to limit lateral movement. Monitoring and logging of database queries and application logs should be enhanced to detect suspicious activities. Additionally, organizations should restrict access to the management interface to trusted IPs and consider disabling the password reset functionality temporarily if feasible. Regular backups of the database are essential to enable recovery in case of data tampering. Finally, organizations should engage with the vendor for updates and patches and plan for prompt application once available.

Description

A weakness has been identified in Campcodes Online Apartment Visitor Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /forgot-password.php. This manipulation of the argument email causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information such as user credentials or personal data stored in the database, undermining confidentiality. Attackers may also alter or delete records, impacting data integrity, or cause database errors that disrupt system availability. Given the visitor management system’s role in controlling access and logging visitor information, exploitation could facilitate unauthorized physical access or enable further attacks on connected systems. The remote, unauthenticated nature of the vulnerability broadens the attack surface, allowing attackers to target multiple deployments without needing insider access. Organizations relying on this system risk data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Although the impact is somewhat limited by the scope of the affected system, the potential for lateral movement or escalation in a broader network environment exists.

Summary

CVE-2025-11599 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Online Apartment Visitor Management System version 1.0, specifically within the /forgot-password.php script. The vulnerability arises from insufficient input validation and sanitization of the 'email' parameter, which is directly incorporated into SQL queries. This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands, potentially enabling unauthorized access to sensitive user data, modification of database contents, or disruption of service. The attack vector requires no user interaction and can be initiated over the network, increasing its accessibility to attackers. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 6.9, reflecting low attack complexity and no privileges required, but limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no active exploitation has been reported, the public disclosure of exploit code elevates the risk of exploitation. The affected product is a niche visitor management system used in apartment complexes to track visitors, making the vulnerability particularly relevant to property management organizations. The lack of available patches necessitates immediate mitigation steps to prevent exploitation.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 21:31 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats