VulnerabilityPublished 12 Oct 2025Updated 16 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-11634: Tomofun Furbo 360 · Information Disclosure

Affects Tomofun Furbo 360Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.4 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

2.4Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 8% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Physical
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Physical: The attack requires the attacker to physically touch or manipulate the vulnerable system. Physical interaction may be brief (e.g., evil maid attack) or persistent.
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Enforce strict physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to devices, including secure mounting, locked enclosures, and restricted access areas.
Regularly audit device placement to ensure they are not accessible to untrusted personnel or visitors.
Monitor for signs of tampering or unauthorized physical access to devices.
If possible, disable or restrict UART interface access on the device hardware or firmware level, or cover UART ports physically to prevent easy access.
Maintain an inventory of all Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini devices deployed and track firmware versions to identify affected units.
Engage with the vendor or community for updates or unofficial patches and consider alternative devices if no vendor support is forthcoming.
For sensitive environments, consider isolating these devices on segmented networks to limit potential lateral movement if compromised.
Educate staff about the risks of physical tampering and the importance of reporting suspicious activity around IoT devices.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. This affects an unknown part of the component UART Interface. The manipulation results in information disclosure. An attack on the physical device is feasible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily related to confidentiality breaches due to information disclosure. Since the attack requires physical access, the threat is more significant in environments where devices are deployed in publicly accessible or unsecured locations, such as offices with open access, shared spaces, or retail environments. Disclosed information could facilitate further attacks, including device cloning, unauthorized access to the device’s network, or privacy violations involving recorded data. The lack of vendor response and patches increases the risk of prolonged exposure. Organizations relying on these devices for monitoring or security purposes may face reduced trustworthiness of the device and potential compliance issues under data protection regulations like GDPR if personal data is exposed. However, the low CVSS score and physical access requirement limit the overall impact to targeted attacks rather than large-scale remote exploitation.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Oct 2025, 13:10 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats