CVE-2025-11635VulnerabilityPublished 12 Oct 2025Updated 16 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-11635: Tomofun Furbo 360 · Resource Consumption

Affects Tomofun Furbo 360Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 39% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

These include isolating Furbo 360 devices on segmented VLANs or dedicated IoT networks to limit exposure to untrusted networks. Employing firewall rules to restrict inbound traffic to the minimum necessary and monitoring network traffic for unusual file upload activity can help detect exploitation attempts. Disabling or restricting file upload functionality if configurable may reduce risk. Regularly auditing device firmware versions and subscribing to vendor or security advisories is critical to apply updates promptly once available. For enterprise environments, consider deploying intrusion detection systems (IDS) or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) with signatures targeting anomalous file upload patterns. Educating users about the risks and encouraging physical security of devices can also mitigate attack vectors. Finally, organizations should evaluate alternative pet monitoring solutions with stronger security postures if risk tolerance is low.

Description

A weakness has been identified in Tomofun Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component File Upload. This manipulation causes resource consumption. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations and consumers using Tomofun Furbo 360 devices, this vulnerability could lead to denial of service conditions, disrupting pet monitoring and related functionalities. In commercial or institutional settings such as veterinary clinics, pet care facilities, or smart home service providers, such disruptions could impact operational continuity and customer trust. Although the vulnerability does not directly compromise data confidentiality or integrity, loss of availability may cause indirect consequences such as missed alerts or inability to monitor pets remotely. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the risk of opportunistic attacks, especially in environments with exposed or poorly segmented networks. Given the vendor's lack of response, affected organizations may face prolonged exposure. The impact is more pronounced in countries with higher adoption rates of smart pet devices and connected home technologies, where the Furbo 360 is popular. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as part of broader attack campaigns targeting IoT devices to create botnets or conduct denial of service attacks on network infrastructure.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Oct 2025, 14:48 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats