VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2025Updated 7 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-12287: Bdtask Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Bdtask Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 39% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Bdtask Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System	Affected =20251013	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

First, apply strict input validation and sanitization on the first_name and last_name parameters at the web application or proxy level to block malicious SQL payloads. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with updated rules to detect and prevent SQL injection attempts targeting the vulnerable endpoint. Restrict network access to the inventory management system’s administrative interface, limiting exposure to trusted internal IP addresses or VPN users only. Conduct thorough code reviews and consider temporary code modifications to parameter handling if feasible. Monitor logs for suspicious activity related to /Admin_dashboard/edit_profile requests, focusing on unusual parameter values or error messages indicative of injection attempts. Implement database least privilege principles to minimize the impact of a successful injection, ensuring the application uses an account with limited permissions. Regularly back up inventory data and test restoration procedures to mitigate data loss or corruption risks. Engage with Bdtask or community forums for updates or unofficial patches. Finally, plan for a migration or upgrade strategy once a vendor patch becomes available.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Bdtask Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System up to 20251013. This impacts an unknown function of the file /Admin_dashboard/edit_profile. Such manipulation of the argument first_name/last_name leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive inventory and business data, potentially resulting in data breaches, financial loss, and operational disruption. Wholesale and inventory management systems are critical for supply chain continuity; exploitation could cause inaccurate inventory records, leading to shipment errors or stock shortages. Confidentiality breaches could expose customer or supplier information, violating GDPR and other data protection regulations, resulting in legal and reputational damage. Integrity compromises could allow attackers to alter inventory data, affecting business decisions and financial reporting. Availability impacts could disrupt business operations, especially for companies relying heavily on automated inventory control. The remote exploitability without user interaction increases the risk of automated attacks targeting exposed systems. European companies using Bdtask products without timely patching or mitigations are particularly vulnerable. The lack of vendor response complicates remediation efforts, necessitating proactive defensive measures. Organizations in sectors with complex supply chains or high inventory turnover are at greater risk of operational impact.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jan 2026, 19:38 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats