CVE-2025-12289VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-12289: Sui Shang Information Technology Suishang Enterprise-Level B2B2C Multi-User Mall System · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Sui Shang Information Technology Suishang Enterprise-Level B2B2C Multi-User Mall SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Sui Shang Information Technology Suishang Enterprise-Level B2B2C Multi-User Mall System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should implement strict input validation and output encoding on the category_id parameter and any other user-controllable inputs to prevent script injection. Deploying a robust Web Application Firewall (WAF) with custom rules to detect and block malicious payloads targeting the vulnerable endpoint can provide immediate protection. Security teams should conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing to identify and remediate similar injection points. User education on phishing risks and cautious handling of suspicious URLs is essential to reduce successful exploitation via social engineering. Monitoring web server logs for unusual requests targeting the /Point/index/activity_state/1/category_id/1001 path can help detect exploitation attempts. If possible, isolating or restricting access to the affected module until a vendor patch is available is advisable. Organizations should also engage with the vendor for updates and consider alternative platforms if remediation is delayed. Regular backups and incident response plans should be updated to address potential XSS incidents.

Description

CVE-2025-12289 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability found in version 1.0 of the Suishang Enterprise-Level B2B2C Multi-User Mall System by Sui Shang Information Technology. The vulnerability exists in the handling of the category_id parameter within the /Point/index/activity_state/1/category_id/1001 endpoint, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious scripts without authentication. Exploitation requires user interaction but no privileges, potentially leading to limited integrity and confidentiality impacts such as session hijacking or phishing. The vendor has not responded to disclosure requests, and no patches are currently available. European organizations using this e-commerce platform could face targeted attacks, especially in countries with higher adoption of this software or significant B2B2C marketplaces. Mitigation involves input validation, web application firewalls, and user awareness. Given the CVSS 5.3 score and attack vector, the threat is moderate but should be addressed promptly to prevent exploitation.

Impact

For European organizations using the Suishang Enterprise-Level B2B2C Multi-User Mall System, this XSS vulnerability could lead to exploitation scenarios where attackers steal user session tokens, perform unauthorized actions on behalf of users, or conduct phishing attacks by injecting malicious content. This compromises the confidentiality and integrity of user data and transactions. Although the vulnerability does not directly affect system availability, successful exploitation could damage organizational reputation, lead to regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR breaches due to data leakage), and cause financial losses. The impact is particularly significant for businesses relying on this platform for customer-facing e-commerce operations, as customer trust and data protection are critical. The absence of a vendor patch increases the window of exposure, raising the risk of targeted attacks, especially in sectors with high online transaction volumes. Organizations may also face challenges in incident response and forensic analysis due to the stealthy nature of XSS attacks.

Summary

CVE-2025-12289 identifies a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Suishang Enterprise-Level B2B2C Multi-User Mall System version 1.0, specifically in the processing of the category_id parameter in the /Point/index/activity_state/1/category_id/1001 endpoint. This flaw allows an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code remotely without requiring authentication or privileges, exploiting insufficient input sanitization or output encoding. When a victim user accesses a crafted URL containing the malicious category_id parameter, the injected script executes in their browser context. This can lead to session hijacking, credential theft, or redirection to malicious sites, compromising user confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 5.3, indicating medium severity, with no known exploits in the wild yet. The vendor was notified but has not issued a patch or response, increasing risk exposure. The attack requires user interaction, such as clicking a malicious link, but no authentication, making it feasible for widespread phishing or social engineering campaigns. The vulnerability affects only version 1.0 of the product, which is an enterprise-level B2B2C multi-user mall system, likely deployed in e-commerce environments. The lack of vendor response and patch availability necessitates immediate defensive measures by users and administrators.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 16:13 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats