Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-12401: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in theode Label Plugins

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-12401cvecve-2025-12401cwe-352
Published: Tue Nov 04 2025 (11/04/2025, 03:26:46 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: theode
Product: Label Plugins

Description

The Label Plugins plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the label_plugins_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 02/27/2026, 20:30:33 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-12401 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Label Plugins plugin for WordPress, specifically in versions up to and including 0.5. The root cause is the absence or improper implementation of nonce validation within the label_plugins_options() function, which is responsible for handling plugin settings updates. Nonces in WordPress serve as tokens to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and not from malicious third parties. Without this protection, attackers can craft malicious web requests that, when executed by an authenticated administrator (via clicking a link or visiting a malicious page), cause unauthorized changes to plugin configurations. This can include injecting malicious scripts or altering settings that compromise site security or functionality. The vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator, making social engineering a key component of exploitation. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.1 reflects a network attack vector with low attack complexity, no privileges required, but requiring user interaction, and impacts confidentiality and integrity with no availability impact. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability poses a moderate risk due to the widespread use of WordPress and the potential for privilege escalation or persistent site compromise through malicious script injection.

Potential Impact

Organizations running WordPress sites with the vulnerable Label Plugins plugin are at risk of unauthorized configuration changes and potential injection of malicious scripts. This can lead to partial compromise of site integrity and confidentiality, including unauthorized access to sensitive data or the ability to perform further attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) or privilege escalation. While availability is not directly impacted, the injected malicious scripts could be used to deliver malware or redirect users to phishing sites, damaging organizational reputation and user trust. The requirement for administrator interaction limits the attack scope but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where administrators may be targeted via phishing or social engineering campaigns. This vulnerability can affect websites ranging from small businesses to large enterprises relying on WordPress for content management, potentially impacting customer data and operational security.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-12401, developers of the Label Plugins plugin should implement robust nonce validation in the label_plugins_options() function to ensure that all requests modifying plugin settings are verified as legitimate and originate from authenticated users. Site administrators should update to a patched version of the plugin once available or disable the plugin if no patch exists. Additionally, administrators should be trained to recognize and avoid clicking suspicious links or performing actions prompted by untrusted sources. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) that can detect and block CSRF attempts may provide an additional layer of defense. Regular security audits and monitoring for unusual administrative activity can help detect exploitation attempts early. Finally, adopting a principle of least privilege for administrative accounts and enforcing multi-factor authentication can reduce the risk of successful exploitation.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-10-28T14:26:10.492Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 690977bf78d4f574c2b12d24

Added to database: 11/4/2025, 3:49:19 AM

Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 8:30:33 PM

Last updated: 3/22/2026, 1:53:13 PM

Views: 78

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses