CVE-2025-1244: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
A command injection flaw was found in the text editor Emacs. It could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands on a vulnerable system. Exploitation is possible by tricking users into visiting a specially crafted website or an HTTP URL with a redirect.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-1244 is an OS command injection vulnerability discovered in the Emacs text editor, a widely used open-source editor primarily on Unix-like systems. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of special elements in user-controllable input, allowing attackers to inject and execute arbitrary shell commands on the victim's system. The attack vector involves tricking users into visiting specially crafted websites or HTTP URLs that leverage redirects to trigger the vulnerability. No authentication is required, but user interaction is necessary to initiate exploitation. The vulnerability affects all versions indicated as '0' in the provided data, likely meaning multiple or unspecified versions of Emacs. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 reflects the vulnerability's network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requiring user interaction (UI:R). The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is high (C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning attackers can fully compromise affected systems. No patches or exploits are currently documented, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and enriched by CISA, indicating government-level awareness and potential prioritization. The vulnerability's root cause is improper input sanitization, a common but critical security flaw that can lead to remote code execution. Given Emacs' prevalence in development, academic, and server environments, this vulnerability poses a significant risk if exploited.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2025-1244 is severe for organizations worldwide using Emacs, especially in Unix-like environments such as Linux and BSD systems. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the user running Emacs, potentially leading to full system compromise. This threatens confidentiality by exposing sensitive data, integrity by allowing unauthorized modifications, and availability by enabling denial-of-service or destructive actions. Since exploitation requires only user interaction (visiting a malicious URL), phishing or watering-hole attacks could be effective. Organizations relying on Emacs for development, system administration, or automation may face operational disruptions, data breaches, or lateral movement by attackers. The lack of authentication requirements broadens the attack surface, increasing risk to remote users and systems exposed to the internet. Although no known exploits exist yet, the vulnerability's characteristics make it a likely target for attackers once exploit code is developed. This could impact sectors such as technology, academia, government, and critical infrastructure where Emacs usage is common.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately monitor official Emacs project channels and trusted security advisories for patches addressing CVE-2025-1244 and apply them as soon as they become available. 2. Until patches are released, restrict or disable Emacs from accessing untrusted URLs or web content, especially in environments where users might open links from unknown sources. 3. Employ network-level protections such as web filtering, DNS filtering, and intrusion prevention systems to block access to known malicious domains and suspicious redirects. 4. Educate users about the risks of clicking on unknown or suspicious links, emphasizing the threat of command injection via crafted URLs. 5. Run Emacs with the least privileges possible to limit the impact of potential exploitation. 6. Use application sandboxing or containerization techniques to isolate Emacs processes from critical system components and data. 7. Implement endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to identify anomalous command execution patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 8. Review and harden system configurations to reduce the attack surface, including disabling unnecessary Emacs features that handle external URLs or scripts. 9. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments focusing on user-facing applications like Emacs that interact with external content. 10. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing remote code execution scenarios to enable rapid containment and remediation.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Japan, Netherlands, India, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, Brazil
CVE-2025-1244: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Description
A command injection flaw was found in the text editor Emacs. It could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands on a vulnerable system. Exploitation is possible by tricking users into visiting a specially crafted website or an HTTP URL with a redirect.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-1244 is an OS command injection vulnerability discovered in the Emacs text editor, a widely used open-source editor primarily on Unix-like systems. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of special elements in user-controllable input, allowing attackers to inject and execute arbitrary shell commands on the victim's system. The attack vector involves tricking users into visiting specially crafted websites or HTTP URLs that leverage redirects to trigger the vulnerability. No authentication is required, but user interaction is necessary to initiate exploitation. The vulnerability affects all versions indicated as '0' in the provided data, likely meaning multiple or unspecified versions of Emacs. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 reflects the vulnerability's network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requiring user interaction (UI:R). The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is high (C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning attackers can fully compromise affected systems. No patches or exploits are currently documented, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and enriched by CISA, indicating government-level awareness and potential prioritization. The vulnerability's root cause is improper input sanitization, a common but critical security flaw that can lead to remote code execution. Given Emacs' prevalence in development, academic, and server environments, this vulnerability poses a significant risk if exploited.
Potential Impact
The impact of CVE-2025-1244 is severe for organizations worldwide using Emacs, especially in Unix-like environments such as Linux and BSD systems. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the user running Emacs, potentially leading to full system compromise. This threatens confidentiality by exposing sensitive data, integrity by allowing unauthorized modifications, and availability by enabling denial-of-service or destructive actions. Since exploitation requires only user interaction (visiting a malicious URL), phishing or watering-hole attacks could be effective. Organizations relying on Emacs for development, system administration, or automation may face operational disruptions, data breaches, or lateral movement by attackers. The lack of authentication requirements broadens the attack surface, increasing risk to remote users and systems exposed to the internet. Although no known exploits exist yet, the vulnerability's characteristics make it a likely target for attackers once exploit code is developed. This could impact sectors such as technology, academia, government, and critical infrastructure where Emacs usage is common.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately monitor official Emacs project channels and trusted security advisories for patches addressing CVE-2025-1244 and apply them as soon as they become available. 2. Until patches are released, restrict or disable Emacs from accessing untrusted URLs or web content, especially in environments where users might open links from unknown sources. 3. Employ network-level protections such as web filtering, DNS filtering, and intrusion prevention systems to block access to known malicious domains and suspicious redirects. 4. Educate users about the risks of clicking on unknown or suspicious links, emphasizing the threat of command injection via crafted URLs. 5. Run Emacs with the least privileges possible to limit the impact of potential exploitation. 6. Use application sandboxing or containerization techniques to isolate Emacs processes from critical system components and data. 7. Implement endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to identify anomalous command execution patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 8. Review and harden system configurations to reduce the attack surface, including disabling unnecessary Emacs features that handle external URLs or scripts. 9. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments focusing on user-facing applications like Emacs that interact with external content. 10. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing remote code execution scenarios to enable rapid containment and remediation.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2025-02-12T07:32:23.452Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d983dc4522896dcbef741
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:17 AM
Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 3:19:25 PM
Last updated: 3/22/2026, 9:58:41 PM
Views: 55
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.