VulnerabilityPublished 5 Jan 2026Updated 8 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-12519: Centreon Infra Monitoring · Missing Authorization

Affects Centreon Infra MonitoringSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium · fixed in 25.10.2 : update Centreon Infra Monitoring when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 13% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 25.10.2, 24.10.15, 24.04.19

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Centreon Infra Monitoring to 25.10.2, 24.10.15 or 24.04.19.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
CentreonInfra Monitoring	Affected >=25.10.0 <25.10.2	Fixed in 25.10.2
CentreonInfra Monitoring	Affected >=24.10.0 <24.10.15	Fixed in 24.10.15
CentreonInfra Monitoring	Affected >=24.04.0 <24.04.19	Fixed in 24.04.19
GitHubcentreon/centreon`pkg:github/centreon/centreon`Other threats	Affected =25.10.0 =24.10.0 =24.04.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

2) Restrict access to the Administration parameters API endpoints by implementing network-level controls such as firewalls, VPNs, or IP whitelisting to limit exposure to trusted users and systems only. 3) Employ strong authentication and authorization mechanisms around the monitoring infrastructure, ensuring that API endpoints enforce proper ACLs. 4) Monitor API access logs for unusual or unauthorized requests targeting administration endpoints to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 5) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on monitoring tools to identify and remediate similar authorization weaknesses. 6) Segment monitoring infrastructure networks from general user networks to reduce attack surface. 7) Educate IT and security teams about the risks of information disclosure through monitoring tools and the importance of securing these systems.

Description

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Centreon Infra Monitoring (Administration parameters API endpoint modules) allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, resulting in Information Disclosure like downtime or acknowledgement configurations. This issue affects Infra Monitoring: from 25.10.0 before 25.10.2, from 24.10.0 before 24.10.15, from 24.04.0 before 24.04.19.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-12519 is the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive monitoring configuration data. This information can reveal planned downtimes, acknowledgement statuses, or other operational parameters that attackers could leverage to time attacks during maintenance windows or avoid detection. While the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, the confidentiality breach can undermine security posture and incident response effectiveness. Organizations in sectors with critical infrastructure, such as energy, finance, telecommunications, and government, may face increased risk if attackers use this information to plan disruptive activities. Additionally, regulatory compliance frameworks like GDPR emphasize protecting operational data, so unauthorized disclosure could lead to compliance issues or reputational damage. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the threat level, especially for organizations exposing Centreon APIs to untrusted networks or lacking proper network segmentation and access controls.

CWE-862Missing Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #4OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 12 Jan 2026, 21:10 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-862

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats