Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-12578: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in rnags Reuters Direct

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-12578cvecve-2025-12578cwe-352
Published: Thu Nov 27 2025 (11/27/2025, 02:26:12 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: rnags
Product: Reuters Direct

Description

The Reuters Direct plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the the 'class-reuters-direct-settings.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 12/04/2025, 04:24:47 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-12578 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified in the Reuters Direct plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 3.0.0. The root cause is the absence or incorrect implementation of nonce validation on the 'class-reuters-direct-settings.php' page, which handles plugin settings. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and prevent CSRF attacks. Without proper nonce validation, attackers can craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated administrator (e.g., by clicking a link), cause unintended actions such as resetting plugin settings. This vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator, making social engineering a key component of exploitation. The impact primarily affects the integrity of the plugin’s configuration, potentially disrupting normal operation or enabling further malicious activities if settings are altered maliciously. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.3, reflecting a medium severity due to its limited impact on confidentiality and availability, ease of exploitation (low complexity), and requirement for user interaction. No patches or exploit code are currently publicly available, and no known active exploitation has been reported. The vulnerability was published on November 27, 2025, and assigned by Wordfence. Organizations using Reuters Direct in WordPress should be aware of this risk and prepare to implement mitigations.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-12578 is the potential unauthorized modification of Reuters Direct plugin settings within WordPress environments. This can lead to disruption of content delivery workflows, misconfiguration that could degrade service quality, or create conditions favorable for further attacks such as privilege escalation or data manipulation. Since Reuters Direct is likely used by media companies, financial institutions, and other organizations relying on Reuters content feeds, any disruption or manipulation could affect business operations, decision-making, and reputational standing. The vulnerability does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, but the integrity compromise could indirectly facilitate more severe attacks if combined with other vulnerabilities or social engineering tactics. The requirement for administrator interaction means that organizations with strong user awareness and phishing defenses may reduce risk, but those with less mature security cultures remain vulnerable. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe and the presence of rnags Reuters Direct plugin in relevant sectors, the threat is material but not critical. Organizations should prioritize mitigation to prevent potential exploitation that could impact operational integrity.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Implement proper nonce validation on all forms and actions within the Reuters Direct plugin, especially on the 'class-reuters-direct-settings.php' page, to ensure requests are legitimate and originate from authorized users. 2. Restrict access to plugin settings pages strictly to necessary administrator roles and consider additional access controls such as IP whitelisting or multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative accounts. 3. Educate site administrators and privileged users about the risks of CSRF and social engineering attacks, emphasizing caution when clicking links or opening unsolicited emails. 4. Monitor WordPress logs and plugin activity for unusual changes to settings or configuration resets that could indicate attempted exploitation. 5. Keep WordPress core, plugins, and themes updated to the latest versions, and apply security patches promptly once available for Reuters Direct. 6. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block suspicious CSRF attempts targeting plugin endpoints. 7. If possible, isolate critical WordPress instances and limit exposure to reduce attack surface. 8. Regularly back up WordPress configurations and plugin settings to enable quick restoration in case of unauthorized changes.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-10-31T21:11:34.927Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6927bf816cbf1e727e3d9591

Added to database: 11/27/2025, 3:03:29 AM

Last enriched: 12/4/2025, 4:24:47 AM

Last updated: 12/4/2025, 11:18:55 PM

Views: 22

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats