CVE-2025-12811VulnerabilityPublished 18 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-12811: Delinea Cloud Suite and Privileged Access Service · HTTP Request/Response Smuggling

Affects Delinea Cloud Suite and Privileged Access ServiceSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Delinea Inc.Cloud Suite and Privileged Access Service	Affected =25.1 HF4 and earlier	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Upgrade affected Delinea Cloud Suite and Privileged Access Service installations to Server Suite 2023.1 (agent 6.0.1) or later as the primary mitigation step. 2. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, apply patches available in Server Suite releases 2023.0.5 (agent 6.0.0-158) or 2022.1.10 (agent 5.9.1-337) to reduce exposure. 3. Implement strict HTTP request validation and normalization at the web application firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy level to detect and block malformed or suspicious HTTP requests indicative of request smuggling attempts. 4. Monitor HTTP traffic logs for anomalies such as unexpected request sequences or header inconsistencies that may signal exploitation attempts. 5. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on HTTP request handling to identify residual weaknesses. 6. Ensure privileged access management policies enforce least privilege and session monitoring to limit potential damage from compromised sessions. 7. Maintain up-to-date threat intelligence feeds to stay informed about emerging exploits targeting this vulnerability.

Description

Improper Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') in Delinea Inc. Cloud Suite and Privileged Access Service. If you're not using the latest Server Suite agents, this fix requires that you upgrade to Server Suite 2023.1 (agent 6.0.1) or later. * If you cannot upgrade to Release 2023.1 (agent version 6.0.1) or later, you can choose one of the following versions: * Server Suite release 2023.0.5 (agent version 6.0.0-158) * Server Suite release 2022.1.10 (agent version 5.9.1-337)

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-12811 can be significant, especially for those relying on Delinea’s Cloud Suite and Privileged Access Service for managing privileged access and securing critical infrastructure. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass security controls, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive administrative functions, session hijacking, or data leakage. This could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of privileged credentials and sensitive operational data, increasing the risk of further lateral movement within networks. Given the critical role of privileged access management in regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR, NIS Directive), exploitation could also result in legal and reputational damage. Although availability is not directly impacted, the indirect consequences of compromised privileged access could disrupt business operations. The absence of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the medium severity rating and ease of exploitation necessitate urgent attention.

CWE-444Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.
Implementation
Use a web server that employs a strict HTTP parsing procedure, such as Apache.
Implementation
Use only SSL communication.
Implementation
Terminate the client session after each request.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.2.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
HTTP Response Smuggling (opens in a new tab)
HTTP Request Smuggling (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Feb 2026, 22:41 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-444

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats