Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-12874: CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in Quest Coexistence Manager for Notes

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-12874cvecve-2025-12874cwe-444
Published: Fri Dec 19 2025 (12/19/2025, 19:36:57 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Quest
Product: Coexistence Manager for Notes

Description

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in Quest Coexistence Manager for Notes (Free/Busy Connector modules) allows HTTP Request Smuggling via the Content-Length-Transfer-Encoding (CL.TE) attack vector. This could allow an attacker to bypass access controls, poison web caches, hijack sessions, or trigger unintended internal requests. This issue affects Coexistence Manager for Notes 3.8.2045. Other versions may also be affected.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 12/19/2025, 20:09:56 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-12874 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-444, involving inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests, commonly known as HTTP Request Smuggling. It specifically affects Quest Coexistence Manager for Notes, version 3.8.2045, particularly the Free/Busy Connector modules. The vulnerability arises due to the way the product processes HTTP headers, specifically the Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers, allowing an attacker to craft specially formed HTTP requests that are interpreted differently by front-end and back-end servers. This discrepancy enables the CL.TE attack vector, where an attacker sends a request with both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers, causing the servers to desynchronize their parsing of the HTTP stream. As a result, attackers can smuggle malicious requests past security controls, leading to bypass of access controls, cache poisoning, session hijacking, or triggering unintended internal requests. The attack does not require authentication or user interaction, increasing its risk profile. Although no known exploits have been reported in the wild, the vulnerability's CVSS 4.0 score of 6.3 reflects a medium severity, with network attack vector, low complexity, and partial impact on confidentiality and integrity. The affected product is used to facilitate coexistence between IBM Notes and Microsoft Exchange environments, making it a critical component in enterprise email infrastructure.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive email scheduling and calendar data, session hijacking of administrative or user accounts, and manipulation or poisoning of web caches that serve internal or external users. This can result in data leakage, disruption of email coexistence services, and potential lateral movement within corporate networks. Given the role of Quest Coexistence Manager in bridging IBM Notes and Microsoft Exchange, disruption or compromise could impact business continuity and confidentiality of communications. Organizations in sectors with high regulatory requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government are particularly at risk due to potential exposure of sensitive personal or classified information. The medium severity rating indicates a moderate but significant risk, especially since no authentication is required and exploitation can be performed remotely over the network. The absence of known exploits suggests a window of opportunity for proactive defense before attackers develop weaponized payloads.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Monitor Quest's official channels for patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-12874 and apply them promptly once available. 2. Implement strict HTTP request validation at web application firewalls (WAFs) or reverse proxies to detect and block malformed requests containing conflicting Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers. 3. Deploy network intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures tuned to detect HTTP request smuggling patterns, especially CL.TE vectors. 4. Segment and isolate the Coexistence Manager servers within the network to limit lateral movement if compromised. 5. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on HTTP request handling to identify similar vulnerabilities. 6. Educate IT and security teams about HTTP request smuggling techniques to improve detection and response capabilities. 7. Review and harden access control policies around the affected modules to minimize exposure. 8. Enable detailed logging of HTTP traffic to facilitate forensic analysis in case of suspicious activity.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
SRA
Date Reserved
2025-11-07T14:41:02.631Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6945ad9494037f6b5356f5f5

Added to database: 12/19/2025, 7:55:00 PM

Last enriched: 12/19/2025, 8:09:56 PM

Last updated: 12/19/2025, 8:56:35 PM

Views: 6

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats