CVE-2025-13239VulnerabilityPublished 16 Nov 2025Updated 17 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13239: Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution · Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow

Affects Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart SolutionSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution	Affected =5	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

In absence of an official patch, European organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization on the /submit_checkout endpoint, particularly for order_total_amount and cart_total_amount parameters, to ensure values conform to expected formats and ranges. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block anomalous parameter manipulations related to checkout amounts. Monitor transaction logs for irregularities or discrepancies between cart totals and submitted order amounts. Implement anomaly detection systems to flag unusual checkout workflows or repeated failed attempts. Consider deploying rate limiting on checkout submissions to reduce automated exploitation risk. Engage in threat hunting for signs of exploitation attempts. If possible, isolate or restrict access to the vulnerable component until a vendor patch or update is available. Maintain up-to-date backups of transaction data to enable recovery from potential disruptions. Finally, liaise with Bdtask or community forums for any emerging patches or mitigation guidance.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution 5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /submit_checkout. Such manipulation of the argument order_total_amount/cart_total_amount leads to enforcement of behavioral workflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using the Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized manipulation of transaction amounts during checkout, potentially resulting in financial losses, order processing errors, or fraudulent transactions. Disruption of the checkout workflow may degrade customer trust and damage brand reputation. Since the exploit requires no authentication and can be launched remotely, attackers could automate exploitation at scale, impacting availability and integrity of eCommerce services. The lack of vendor response and absence of patches increases the window of exposure. European eCommerce businesses, especially those handling high volumes of transactions, may face operational and financial risks. Additionally, regulatory compliance concerns such as GDPR may arise if transaction data integrity is compromised, leading to potential legal and financial penalties.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Nov 2025, 07:05 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats