VulnerabilityPublished 16 Nov 2025Updated 17 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13246: shsuishang ShopSuite ModulithShop · Path Traversal

Affects shsuishang ShopSuite ModulithShopSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 34% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-13246, organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Conduct immediate code review and audit of the JwtAuthenticationFilter to ensure strict validation and sanitization of all path inputs, explicitly disallowing traversal sequences such as '../'. 2) Employ application-level whitelisting of accessible file paths to restrict file access strictly to intended directories. 3) Utilize runtime application self-protection (RASP) or web application firewalls (WAF) configured to detect and block path traversal patterns in HTTP requests targeting the authentication filter endpoints. 4) Monitor logs for anomalous access patterns or attempts to exploit path traversal, focusing on requests containing suspicious path characters or sequences. 5) Engage with the vendor or community to obtain the latest rolling release updates that may address this vulnerability and apply them promptly. 6) Isolate the application environment with least privilege principles, limiting file system permissions to minimize potential damage from unauthorized file access. 7) Implement network segmentation to restrict external access to administrative or sensitive endpoints. 8) Conduct penetration testing focused on path traversal vectors to verify the effectiveness of mitigations. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable component and the product’s continuous delivery model.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in shsuishang ShopSuite ModulithShop up to 45a99398cec3b7ad7ff9383694f0b53339f2d35a. Impacted is the function JwtAuthenticationFilter of the file src/main/java/com/suisung/shopsuite/common/security/JwtAuthenticationFilter.java. The manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.

Impact

For European organizations using the ShopSuite ModulithShop platform, this vulnerability poses a tangible risk of unauthorized data disclosure and potential service disruption. Attackers exploiting the path traversal flaw could access sensitive files such as configuration files, authentication tokens, or customer data stored on the server, undermining confidentiality. This could lead to compliance violations under GDPR due to exposure of personal data. Integrity might be compromised if attackers modify files or configurations, potentially enabling persistent backdoors or manipulation of business logic. Availability impacts are less direct but possible if critical system files are targeted, causing application failures or downtime. The medium CVSS score reflects moderate risk; however, the availability of public exploits increases the likelihood of exploitation attempts. European e-commerce businesses relying on this platform may face reputational damage, financial losses, and regulatory penalties if the vulnerability is exploited. The rolling release model complicates patch management, increasing the window of exposure. Organizations with limited security monitoring or outdated deployment practices are particularly vulnerable.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Nov 2025, 10:54 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats