CVE-2025-13250VulnerabilityPublished 16 Nov 2025Updated 17 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13250: WeiYe-Jing datax-web · Improper Access Controls

Affects WeiYe-Jing datax-webSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 35% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubweiye-jing/datax-web`pkg:github/weiye-jing/datax-web`Other threats	Affected =2.1.0 =2.1.1 =2.1.2	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Monitor WeiYe-Jing vendor channels closely for official patches addressing CVE-2025-13250 and apply them promptly once available. 2. Restrict network access to the datax-web Job Handler interface using firewall rules, VPNs, or zero-trust segmentation to limit exposure to trusted users and systems only. 3. Implement strong authentication and authorization controls around job management functions, ensuring that only authorized personnel can invoke sensitive job operations. 4. Conduct regular audits and monitoring of job execution logs to detect unauthorized or anomalous job manipulation activities. 5. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious requests targeting job handler endpoints. 6. Isolate datax-web instances in secure network zones with minimal exposure to external networks. 7. Educate administrators and users on the risks of improper access controls and enforce the principle of least privilege for job management roles. 8. Consider temporary disabling or limiting job handler functionalities if immediate patching is not feasible, balancing operational needs and security.

Description

A vulnerability was detected in WeiYe-Jing datax-web up to 2.1.2. This impacts the function remove/update/pause/start/triggerJob of the component Job Handler. Performing manipulation results in improper access controls. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, exploitation of CVE-2025-13250 could result in unauthorized manipulation of job scheduling and execution, leading to operational disruptions, data processing errors, or denial of service in critical workflows. Industries relying heavily on automated job management, such as finance, manufacturing, telecommunications, and public services, may experience degraded service availability or data integrity issues. The vulnerability could be leveraged to disrupt business continuity or sabotage automated processes. Since the attack can be initiated remotely with limited privileges, organizations with exposed or poorly segmented datax-web interfaces are at higher risk. The impact extends to compliance risks if job manipulations affect data processing governed by regulations like GDPR. Additionally, the availability of public exploit code increases the threat landscape, necessitating urgent attention to prevent potential targeted attacks or opportunistic exploitation within European networks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Nov 2025, 13:02 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats