CVE-2025-13259VulnerabilityPublished 17 Nov 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-13259: Campcodes Supplier Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Supplier Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Supplier Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Apply patches or updates from Campcodes as soon as they become available to remediate the SQL injection vulnerability. 2. Until a patch is released, implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the /manufacturer/edit_unit.php endpoint and the ID parameter. 3. Conduct a thorough code review of the affected module to implement proper input validation and use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent injection. 4. Restrict database user permissions to the minimum necessary to limit the impact of any successful injection. 5. Monitor logs and network traffic for suspicious activity indicative of SQL injection attempts. 6. Educate developers on secure coding practices to prevent similar vulnerabilities in future releases. 7. If feasible, isolate the supplier management system network segment to reduce exposure to external threats. 8. Perform regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on injection vulnerabilities.

Description

A flaw has been found in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /manufacturer/edit_unit.php. This manipulation of the argument ID causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Supplier Management System can allow attackers to remotely execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially leading to unauthorized disclosure, modification, or deletion of sensitive supplier and manufacturing data. This could disrupt supply chain operations, cause data integrity issues, and result in downtime or loss of availability of the management system. Organizations relying on this system for supplier coordination and inventory management may face operational disruptions and reputational damage if exploited. The impact is particularly significant for companies with critical supply chain dependencies or regulatory compliance requirements involving data protection. Since the vulnerability requires no authentication, it increases the attack surface and risk of exploitation by external threat actors. However, the impact is somewhat limited by the niche usage of the Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0, reducing the overall global exposure compared to more widely deployed software.

Summary

CVE-2025-13259 is a SQL injection vulnerability identified in Campcodes Supplier Management System version 1.0. The vulnerability resides in the /manufacturer/edit_unit.php script, where the ID parameter is improperly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands. This flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, making it accessible to unauthenticated attackers over the network. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion within the backend database, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of supplier management data. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting low complexity of attack (no authentication or user interaction needed) but limited scope and impact due to the specific affected component and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no active exploitation has been reported, the public availability of an exploit increases the risk of future attacks. The vulnerability highlights the importance of proper input validation and parameterized queries in web applications managing critical supply chain data.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:24 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats