CVE-2025-13260VulnerabilityPublished 17 Nov 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-13260: Campcodes Supplier Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Supplier Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Supplier Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-13260, organizations should first verify if they are running Campcodes Supplier Management System version 1.0 and isolate affected instances. Since no official patches are currently available, immediate mitigation steps include implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the cmbProductUnit parameter. Input validation and sanitization should be enforced at the application level, ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly escaped or parameterized before database queries. Restrict database user permissions to the minimum necessary to limit the impact of potential injection attacks. Monitor logs for suspicious activity related to /manufacturer/edit_product.php and cmbProductUnit parameter usage. Additionally, consider deploying network segmentation to limit exposure of the supplier management system to untrusted networks. Organizations should engage with Campcodes for updates on patches and apply them promptly once released. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on injection vulnerabilities to proactively identify and remediate similar issues.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /manufacturer/edit_product.php. Such manipulation of the argument cmbProductUnit leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0 poses a moderate risk to organizations using this software. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive supplier and product data, data manipulation, or deletion, impacting business operations and supply chain integrity. Confidentiality breaches could expose proprietary or personal information, while integrity violations could corrupt critical supplier records. Availability impact is limited but possible if database operations are disrupted. Since the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication, attackers can launch attacks from anywhere on the internet, increasing the threat surface. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, but public disclosure may prompt attackers to develop exploits. Organizations in sectors relying heavily on supplier management systems, such as manufacturing, retail, and logistics, may face operational disruptions and reputational damage if exploited.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:24 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats