CVE-2025-13261VulnerabilityPublished 17 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13261: lsfusion platform · Path Traversal

Affects lsfusion platformSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 55% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHublsfusion/platform`pkg:github/lsfusion/platform`Other threats	Affected =6.0 =6.1	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediately audit and restrict access to the DownloadFileRequestHandler functionality, especially the 'Version' parameter, to ensure it does not accept directory traversal sequences such as '../'. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all file path parameters to enforce allowed file path patterns and prevent traversal. 3. Employ application-level whitelisting to restrict file downloads to a predefined safe directory or set of files. 4. Monitor web server and application logs for unusual file access patterns or attempts to exploit path traversal. 5. If possible, isolate the lsfusion platform in a segmented network zone with limited access to sensitive file systems. 6. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain and apply official patches or updates once available. 7. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block path traversal attempts targeting the 'Version' parameter. 8. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on file handling components to detect similar vulnerabilities.

Description

A vulnerability was found in lsfusion platform up to 6.1. Affected is the function DownloadFileRequestHandler of the file web-client/src/main/java/lsfusion/http/controller/file/DownloadFileRequestHandler.java. Performing manipulation of the argument Version results in path traversal. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-13261 is the potential unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential files hosted on lsfusion platform servers. This could include intellectual property, personal data protected under GDPR, or internal configuration files that could further aid attackers. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the risk of widespread attacks, especially in sectors where lsfusion is used for critical business applications. Data breaches resulting from this vulnerability could lead to regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Organizations in finance, healthcare, government, and manufacturing sectors using lsfusion may face heightened risks due to the sensitivity of their data. The availability of a public exploit increases the likelihood of opportunistic attacks, making timely mitigation essential to reduce exposure.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Nov 2025, 04:51 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats