CVE-2025-13415VulnerabilityPublished 19 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13415: icret EasyImages · Cross Site Scripting

Affects icret EasyImagesSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubicret/EasyImages`pkg:github/icret/EasyImages`Other threats	Affected =2.8.0 =2.8.1 =2.8.2 =2.8.3 =2.8.4 =2.8.5 =2.8.6	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-13415, organizations should first verify if they are running affected versions (2.8.0 through 2.8.6) of icret EasyImages and plan immediate upgrades once patches become available. In the absence of official patches, implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'File' parameter within the /app/upload.php endpoint to neutralize malicious scripts. Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting XSS payloads to block exploit attempts at the perimeter. Educate users about the risks of clicking untrusted links to reduce the likelihood of successful social engineering. Monitor web server logs and application behavior for unusual requests or error patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. Consider isolating or restricting access to the SVG Image Handler component if feasible. Regularly review and update security policies and incident response plans to address potential client-side attacks. Finally, maintain awareness of vendor announcements for official patches or updates.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in icret EasyImages up to 2.8.6. This affects an unknown part of the file /app/upload.php of the component SVG Image Handler. The manipulation of the argument File leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-13415 can be significant, especially for those relying on icret EasyImages for web content management or digital asset handling. Successful exploitation could lead to client-side attacks such as session hijacking, enabling attackers to impersonate legitimate users and access sensitive data. Phishing or defacement attacks could damage organizational reputation and erode customer trust. Since the vulnerability requires user interaction, social engineering campaigns could be used to increase success rates. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it still poses a tangible risk to confidentiality and integrity of user sessions. Organizations in sectors with high web exposure, such as e-commerce, media, and public services, are particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the absence of known exploits currently provides a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before widespread attacks emerge.

Summary

CVE-2025-13415 identifies a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the icret EasyImages product, versions 2.8.0 through 2.8.6. The vulnerability is located in the SVG Image Handler component, specifically within the /app/upload.php file. The issue stems from insufficient sanitization or validation of the 'File' parameter, which can be manipulated by an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code. This vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication but requires some user interaction, such as a victim clicking a crafted link or visiting a malicious page that triggers the payload. The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.1 reflects a medium severity level, indicating moderate impact primarily on confidentiality and integrity through client-side script execution. Exploitation could allow attackers to perform actions like session hijacking, cookie theft, or redirect users to malicious sites, potentially leading to further compromise or data leakage. No known public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability's presence in a widely used image handling component makes it a notable risk. The lack of patches or official fixes at the time of publication necessitates immediate attention from administrators using affected versions. The vulnerability does not affect availability directly but can undermine user trust and system integrity.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Nov 2025, 04:51 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats