CVE-2025-13554VulnerabilityPublished 23 Nov 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-13554: Campcodes Supplier Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Supplier Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Supplier Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-13554, organizations should first verify if they are running Campcodes Supplier Management System version 1.0 and isolate affected instances. Immediate steps include implementing web application firewall (WAF) rules specifically designed to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the txtUsername parameter in /index.php. Input validation and sanitization should be enforced at the application level, employing parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent injection. Network segmentation can limit exposure of the vulnerable system to untrusted networks. Monitoring and logging of login attempts and unusual database queries should be enhanced to detect exploitation attempts early. Organizations should engage with the vendor for patches or updates and apply them promptly once available. Additionally, conducting a thorough security audit of the supplier management system and related infrastructure can identify other potential weaknesses. User awareness training on recognizing suspicious activity related to supplier systems can also aid in early detection.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /index.php of the component Login. Such manipulation of the argument txtUsername leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0 can have significant impacts on organizations using this software. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive supplier and business data, potentially exposing confidential information or intellectual property. Attackers might manipulate or delete critical database records, disrupting supply chain operations and causing data integrity issues. The ability to bypass authentication could allow attackers to gain elevated access, leading to further compromise of internal systems. Such disruptions can result in operational downtime, financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory compliance violations, especially for organizations in regulated industries. Given the remote exploitability without authentication, the threat surface is broad, increasing the urgency for mitigation. While no active exploits are reported, the public disclosure may prompt attackers to develop weaponized exploits, increasing risk over time.

Summary

CVE-2025-13554 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Supplier Management System version 1.0. The issue is located in the /index.php file, specifically in the Login component where the txtUsername parameter is improperly sanitized. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability could enable attackers to bypass authentication, extract sensitive supplier or organizational data, modify or delete database records, or potentially escalate privileges within the application. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), and no user interaction (UI:N). The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is low to medium, but the scope is limited to the affected component. No patches or fixes have been publicly linked yet, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild. However, the public disclosure increases the risk of exploitation attempts. Organizations relying on Campcodes Supplier Management System 1.0 should assess their exposure and implement immediate mitigations or seek vendor updates once available.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:08 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats