CVE-2025-13561VulnerabilityPublished 23 Nov 2025Updated 24 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13561: SourceCodester Company Website CMS · SQL Injection

Affects SourceCodester Company Website CMSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SourceCodester Company Website CMS	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediately restrict access to the /admin/index.php interface using network-level controls such as IP whitelisting, VPNs, or web application firewalls (WAFs) to limit exposure. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the Username parameter, employing parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. 3. Monitor web server and database logs for anomalous queries or repeated failed login attempts indicative of exploitation attempts. 4. If possible, upgrade to a patched version of the CMS once available or apply vendor-provided fixes promptly. 5. Conduct a thorough security audit of all web-facing applications to identify similar injection flaws. 6. Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) tools to detect and block injection attacks in real-time. 7. Educate development and operations teams on secure coding practices to prevent recurrence. 8. Regularly back up databases and verify restoration procedures to minimize impact from potential data manipulation or destruction. 9. Consider deploying database activity monitoring solutions to alert on suspicious queries. 10. Engage in threat intelligence sharing with industry peers to stay informed about emerging exploits targeting this vulnerability.

Description

A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Company Website CMS 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/index.php. This manipulation of the argument Username causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Impact

For European organizations using SourceCodester Company Website CMS 1.0, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive administrative data, including user credentials and internal configurations. The SQL injection could be leveraged to extract customer data, intellectual property, or financial information, resulting in data breaches and regulatory non-compliance under GDPR. Integrity of website content and backend data could be compromised, potentially damaging organizational reputation and trust. Availability impacts, while rated low, could still manifest if attackers execute destructive SQL commands. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the threat surface, especially for organizations with publicly accessible admin portals. This vulnerability could also serve as a foothold for further network intrusion or lateral movement within corporate environments. The potential financial and operational impacts underscore the need for swift mitigation, particularly in sectors with high data sensitivity such as finance, healthcare, and government services in Europe.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Nov 2025, 18:13 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats