CVE-2025-13872: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ObjectPlanet Opinio
Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 rev12562 on Web-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests to an arbitrary destination.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-13872 identifies a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ObjectPlanet Opinio version 7.26 rev12562, specifically within its survey-import feature on web-based platforms. SSRF vulnerabilities allow attackers to abuse a vulnerable server to send crafted HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations, potentially accessing internal or protected network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally. This particular vulnerability is 'blind,' meaning the attacker does not receive direct response data from the server, limiting the immediate impact but still enabling internal network reconnaissance or triggering side effects on targeted systems. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have high privileges (authenticated with high rights) on the Opinio platform, and the attack complexity is high, indicating that exploitation is not straightforward. The CVSS 4.0 score is 2.1, reflecting low severity due to limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, no user interaction required, and no scope change. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been published yet. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-918, which covers SSRF issues. The attack vector is network-based, and the vulnerability is considered low impact but should be addressed to prevent potential internal network abuse or pivoting by attackers with existing access.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this SSRF vulnerability lies in the potential for internal network reconnaissance or indirect attacks initiated from the vulnerable Opinio server. Although the vulnerability itself does not allow direct data exfiltration or system compromise, an attacker with high privileges could leverage it to access internal services, metadata endpoints, or other protected resources within the organization's network. This could facilitate lateral movement or information gathering for subsequent attacks. Organizations processing sensitive survey data or operating in regulated sectors (e.g., finance, healthcare, government) may face increased risk if internal systems are exposed via SSRF. However, the requirement for high authentication privileges and the high attack complexity reduce the likelihood of widespread exploitation. The low CVSS score indicates limited immediate risk, but the vulnerability should not be ignored, especially in environments where Opinio is integrated with critical internal infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict outbound HTTP requests from the Opinio server to only trusted destinations using network-level controls such as firewalls or proxy whitelisting. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the survey-import feature to prevent injection of malicious URLs. 3. Monitor and log outbound requests from the Opinio server to detect anomalous or unauthorized access attempts. 4. Enforce the principle of least privilege by limiting user roles and permissions within Opinio, reducing the number of users with high privileges. 5. Isolate the Opinio server within a segmented network zone to limit access to sensitive internal resources. 6. Apply any vendor patches or updates promptly once available. 7. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on SSRF and related web vulnerabilities. 8. Educate administrators and users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of secure configuration and access controls.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-2025-13872: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ObjectPlanet Opinio
Description
Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the survey-import feature of ObjectPlanet Opinio 7.26 rev12562 on Web-based platforms allows an attacker to force the server to perform HTTP GET requests via crafted import requests to an arbitrary destination.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-13872 identifies a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ObjectPlanet Opinio version 7.26 rev12562, specifically within its survey-import feature on web-based platforms. SSRF vulnerabilities allow attackers to abuse a vulnerable server to send crafted HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations, potentially accessing internal or protected network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally. This particular vulnerability is 'blind,' meaning the attacker does not receive direct response data from the server, limiting the immediate impact but still enabling internal network reconnaissance or triggering side effects on targeted systems. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have high privileges (authenticated with high rights) on the Opinio platform, and the attack complexity is high, indicating that exploitation is not straightforward. The CVSS 4.0 score is 2.1, reflecting low severity due to limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, no user interaction required, and no scope change. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been published yet. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-918, which covers SSRF issues. The attack vector is network-based, and the vulnerability is considered low impact but should be addressed to prevent potential internal network abuse or pivoting by attackers with existing access.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this SSRF vulnerability lies in the potential for internal network reconnaissance or indirect attacks initiated from the vulnerable Opinio server. Although the vulnerability itself does not allow direct data exfiltration or system compromise, an attacker with high privileges could leverage it to access internal services, metadata endpoints, or other protected resources within the organization's network. This could facilitate lateral movement or information gathering for subsequent attacks. Organizations processing sensitive survey data or operating in regulated sectors (e.g., finance, healthcare, government) may face increased risk if internal systems are exposed via SSRF. However, the requirement for high authentication privileges and the high attack complexity reduce the likelihood of widespread exploitation. The low CVSS score indicates limited immediate risk, but the vulnerability should not be ignored, especially in environments where Opinio is integrated with critical internal infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict outbound HTTP requests from the Opinio server to only trusted destinations using network-level controls such as firewalls or proxy whitelisting. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the survey-import feature to prevent injection of malicious URLs. 3. Monitor and log outbound requests from the Opinio server to detect anomalous or unauthorized access attempts. 4. Enforce the principle of least privilege by limiting user roles and permissions within Opinio, reducing the number of users with high privileges. 5. Isolate the Opinio server within a segmented network zone to limit access to sensitive internal resources. 6. Apply any vendor patches or updates promptly once available. 7. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on SSRF and related web vulnerabilities. 8. Educate administrators and users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of secure configuration and access controls.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- TCS-CERT
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-02T09:17:04.605Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 692ebbcb5ae7112264a6911e
Added to database: 12/2/2025, 10:13:31 AM
Last enriched: 12/9/2025, 10:54:52 AM
Last updated: 1/16/2026, 1:34:45 PM
Views: 86
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14510: CWE-303 Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm in ABB ABB Ability OPTIMAX
HighCVE-2026-0616: CWE-497: Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere in TheLibrarian TheLibrarian.io
HighCVE-2026-0615: CWE-497: Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere in TheLibrarian TheLibrarian.io
HighCVE-2026-0613: CWE-497: Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere in TheLibrarian TheLibrarian.io
HighCVE-2026-0612: CWE-497: Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere in TheLibrarian TheLibrarian.io
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.