Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-14077: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in openchamp Simcast

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-14077cvecve-2025-14077cwe-352
Published: Wed Jan 07 2026 (01/07/2026, 09:21:05 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: openchamp
Product: Simcast

Description

The Simcast plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settingsPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 02/27/2026, 10:49:01 UTC

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-14077 affects the Simcast plugin for WordPress, developed by openchamp, specifically versions up to and including 1.0.0. This security flaw is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability categorized under CWE-352. The root cause is the absence or improper implementation of nonce validation in the settingsPage function of the plugin. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests intended to change state or settings originate from legitimate users and not from malicious third parties. Due to this missing validation, an attacker can craft a malicious request that, when an authenticated site administrator clicks a link or visits a page controlled by the attacker, causes unauthorized changes to the plugin’s settings. This attack vector does not require the attacker to be authenticated, but it does require user interaction from an administrator, making it a targeted social engineering risk. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.3 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based with low attack complexity, no privileges required, but requiring user interaction. The impact affects integrity only, with no confidentiality or availability impact. No patches or fixes have been linked yet, and no known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability is significant because it can allow attackers to manipulate plugin behavior, potentially leading to further compromise depending on how the plugin settings affect site functionality.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is the unauthorized modification of plugin settings, which compromises the integrity of the affected WordPress site’s configuration. While confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, altered plugin settings could lead to degraded functionality, misconfiguration, or enablement of further attack vectors if the plugin controls critical site features. For organizations, this can result in loss of trust, potential site downtime, or exposure to additional vulnerabilities if attackers leverage the modified settings for privilege escalation or data manipulation. Since exploitation requires tricking an administrator, targeted phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to exploit this vulnerability. The widespread use of WordPress globally and the popularity of plugins make this a relevant threat for many websites, especially those with multiple administrators or less security awareness. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, as attackers may develop exploits once the vulnerability is publicly known.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should first check for updates or patches from the plugin vendor and apply them promptly once available. In the absence of an official patch, administrators can implement manual nonce validation in the settingsPage function to ensure that all state-changing requests include valid nonces. Additionally, administrators should enforce strict user access controls, limiting plugin configuration permissions to trusted users only. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious CSRF attempts can provide an additional layer of defense. Educating site administrators about the risks of clicking unsolicited links and implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) can reduce the likelihood of successful social engineering attacks. Regular security audits and monitoring of plugin settings for unauthorized changes can help detect exploitation attempts early. Finally, consider disabling or replacing the Simcast plugin if it is not essential or if no timely patch is available.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-12-04T22:41:35.907Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 695e4c137349d0379d7d5789

Added to database: 1/7/2026, 12:05:39 PM

Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 10:49:01 AM

Last updated: 3/26/2026, 9:19:45 AM

Views: 65

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses