Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-14158: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in octagonsimon Coding Blocks

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-14158cvecve-2025-14158cwe-352
Published: Fri Dec 12 2025 (12/12/2025, 03:20:45 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: octagonsimon
Product: Coding Blocks

Description

The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings including the theme configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 12/19/2025, 05:10:41 UTC

Technical Analysis

The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress, developed by octagonsimon, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-14158. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 1.1.0 due to the absence of nonce validation on the settings update functionality. Nonce validation is a security mechanism used to ensure that requests to change settings originate from legitimate users and not from forged requests. Without this protection, an attacker can craft a malicious link or webpage that, when visited by a logged-in site administrator, triggers unauthorized changes to the plugin's settings, including theme configurations. The attack does not require the attacker to be authenticated, but it does require the administrator to interact with the malicious content (e.g., clicking a link). The vulnerability impacts the integrity of the site by allowing unauthorized modifications but does not directly affect confidentiality or availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.3 reflects this medium severity, with an attack vector of network (remote), low attack complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction needed. No known exploits have been reported in the wild as of the publication date. The lack of nonce validation is a common security oversight in WordPress plugins and can be mitigated by implementing proper nonce checks on all state-changing requests. This vulnerability highlights the importance of secure coding practices in plugin development and the need for administrators to be cautious about interacting with untrusted content while logged into administrative accounts.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-14158 is the potential unauthorized modification of WordPress plugin settings, which could lead to degraded site functionality, misconfiguration, or the weakening of security controls. Although this vulnerability does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, the integrity compromise can be leveraged as a foothold for further attacks or to alter site appearance and behavior, potentially damaging brand reputation and user trust. Organizations relying on WordPress for their public-facing websites or internal portals that use the Coding Blocks plugin are at risk, especially if administrators are targeted via phishing or social engineering to trigger the CSRF attack. The medium severity rating indicates that while the threat is not critical, it is significant enough to warrant prompt remediation to prevent exploitation. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe, especially among SMEs and public sector entities, the vulnerability could have a broad impact if left unaddressed. Additionally, compromised plugin settings could indirectly facilitate other attacks, such as cross-site scripting or privilege escalation, if combined with other vulnerabilities.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediately monitor for updates or patches from the octagonsimon Coding Blocks plugin developers and apply them as soon as they are released. 2. Until a patch is available, consider disabling the plugin or restricting access to the plugin settings page to only the most trusted administrators. 3. Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules that detect and block suspicious CSRF attempts targeting the plugin's settings endpoints. 4. Educate WordPress administrators about the risks of clicking on untrusted links or visiting suspicious websites while logged into administrative accounts. 5. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins to identify missing nonce validations or other security weaknesses. 6. Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) for WordPress administrator accounts to reduce the risk of account compromise. 7. Use security plugins that can detect and alert on unauthorized changes to plugin settings or themes. 8. Review and harden WordPress security configurations, including limiting plugin installations to those from trusted sources and maintaining least privilege principles for user roles.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-12-05T20:35:29.484Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 693b918b650da22753edbe22

Added to database: 12/12/2025, 3:52:43 AM

Last enriched: 12/19/2025, 5:10:41 AM

Last updated: 2/4/2026, 7:28:12 AM

Views: 39

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats