CVE-2025-14162: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in magblogapi BMLT WordPress Plugin
The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-14162 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the BMLT WordPress Plugin developed by magblogapi, affecting all versions up to and including 3.11.4. The vulnerability stems from the absence of nonce validation on two critical plugin actions: 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option'. Nonce validation is a security mechanism used in WordPress to ensure that requests to perform sensitive actions originate from legitimate users and not from forged requests. Without this protection, an attacker can craft a malicious link or webpage that, when visited by an authenticated site administrator, triggers unauthorized creation or deletion of plugin settings. This can lead to unauthorized changes in plugin configuration, potentially undermining site security or functionality. The vulnerability requires no prior authentication but does require the administrator to interact with the malicious content (user interaction). The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity level due to the limited impact on confidentiality and availability, but a potential integrity impact. No known exploits have been reported in the wild as of the publication date. The vulnerability was publicly disclosed on December 12, 2025, and no official patches or updates are currently linked, indicating that users must apply manual mitigations or monitor for forthcoming updates. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe and the plugin’s role in managing meeting lists or event data, this vulnerability could be leveraged to disrupt or manipulate site configurations if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential unauthorized modification of plugin settings, which could lead to degraded site functionality, misconfiguration, or indirect security weaknesses. While it does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, altered plugin settings could be used as a foothold for further attacks or to disrupt services relying on the plugin. Organizations using the BMLT plugin for managing community or organizational events may face operational disruptions. The requirement for administrator interaction reduces the likelihood of widespread automated exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where phishing or social engineering attacks are prevalent. The impact is more pronounced for organizations with less mature security awareness or insufficient administrative access controls. Given the medium CVSS score and no known active exploitation, the threat is moderate but warrants timely attention to prevent escalation or chained attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting administrative access to trusted personnel only and enforcing strong authentication mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of compromised admin accounts. 2. Educate administrators and site managers about the risks of phishing and social engineering attacks, emphasizing caution when clicking on unsolicited links or visiting untrusted websites. 3. Implement web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block suspicious CSRF attempts targeting the plugin’s action endpoints. 4. Monitor WordPress plugin updates closely and apply patches as soon as they become available from the vendor or community. 5. If possible, manually add nonce validation to the affected plugin actions by modifying the plugin code to include WordPress nonce checks, thereby preventing unauthorized requests. 6. Regularly audit plugin settings and logs for unauthorized changes to detect potential exploitation early. 7. Consider isolating or limiting the plugin’s use on critical systems until a secure version is released.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-14162: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in magblogapi BMLT WordPress Plugin
Description
The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-14162 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the BMLT WordPress Plugin developed by magblogapi, affecting all versions up to and including 3.11.4. The vulnerability stems from the absence of nonce validation on two critical plugin actions: 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option'. Nonce validation is a security mechanism used in WordPress to ensure that requests to perform sensitive actions originate from legitimate users and not from forged requests. Without this protection, an attacker can craft a malicious link or webpage that, when visited by an authenticated site administrator, triggers unauthorized creation or deletion of plugin settings. This can lead to unauthorized changes in plugin configuration, potentially undermining site security or functionality. The vulnerability requires no prior authentication but does require the administrator to interact with the malicious content (user interaction). The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity level due to the limited impact on confidentiality and availability, but a potential integrity impact. No known exploits have been reported in the wild as of the publication date. The vulnerability was publicly disclosed on December 12, 2025, and no official patches or updates are currently linked, indicating that users must apply manual mitigations or monitor for forthcoming updates. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe and the plugin’s role in managing meeting lists or event data, this vulnerability could be leveraged to disrupt or manipulate site configurations if exploited.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential unauthorized modification of plugin settings, which could lead to degraded site functionality, misconfiguration, or indirect security weaknesses. While it does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, altered plugin settings could be used as a foothold for further attacks or to disrupt services relying on the plugin. Organizations using the BMLT plugin for managing community or organizational events may face operational disruptions. The requirement for administrator interaction reduces the likelihood of widespread automated exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where phishing or social engineering attacks are prevalent. The impact is more pronounced for organizations with less mature security awareness or insufficient administrative access controls. Given the medium CVSS score and no known active exploitation, the threat is moderate but warrants timely attention to prevent escalation or chained attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting administrative access to trusted personnel only and enforcing strong authentication mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of compromised admin accounts. 2. Educate administrators and site managers about the risks of phishing and social engineering attacks, emphasizing caution when clicking on unsolicited links or visiting untrusted websites. 3. Implement web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block suspicious CSRF attempts targeting the plugin’s action endpoints. 4. Monitor WordPress plugin updates closely and apply patches as soon as they become available from the vendor or community. 5. If possible, manually add nonce validation to the affected plugin actions by modifying the plugin code to include WordPress nonce checks, thereby preventing unauthorized requests. 6. Regularly audit plugin settings and logs for unauthorized changes to detect potential exploitation early. 7. Consider isolating or limiting the plugin’s use on critical systems until a secure version is released.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-05T20:46:00.918Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 693b918b650da22753edbe34
Added to database: 12/12/2025, 3:52:43 AM
Last enriched: 12/12/2025, 4:04:02 AM
Last updated: 12/14/2025, 12:23:27 PM
Views: 20
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14656: Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-14655: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-14654: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-14653: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Student Management System
MediumCVE-2025-14652: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Online Cake Ordering System
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.