CVE-2025-14162: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in magblogapi BMLT WordPress Plugin
The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-14162 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the BMLT WordPress Plugin developed by magblogapi, affecting all versions up to and including 3.11.4. The root cause is the absence of nonce validation on two critical plugin actions: 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option'. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and prevent unauthorized actions. Without nonce validation, attackers can craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated administrator (via clicking a link or visiting a malicious page), cause unauthorized creation or deletion of plugin settings. This vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator, making exploitation more challenging. The impact is limited to integrity, as attackers can alter plugin configuration but cannot directly access sensitive data or disrupt service availability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) reflects network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality or availability impact, and limited integrity impact. No patches or exploit code are currently publicly available, but the vulnerability is published and should be addressed promptly. This issue is categorized under CWE-352, a common web security weakness related to CSRF attacks.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the integrity of the BMLT WordPress Plugin’s configuration settings. An attacker can manipulate plugin options by tricking an administrator into executing a forged request, potentially leading to unauthorized changes in plugin behavior or settings. While this does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, altered plugin configurations could indirectly weaken site security or functionality, possibly enabling further attacks or misconfigurations. Organizations relying on this plugin for critical functionality may face operational disruptions or security policy violations. Because exploitation requires administrator interaction, the risk is somewhat mitigated but remains significant in environments with many administrators or where phishing/social engineering is effective. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or availability directly, limiting the scope of damage. No known exploits in the wild reduce immediate risk, but the public disclosure increases the likelihood of future exploitation attempts.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should first check for and apply any official patches or updates from the magblogapi vendor once available. In the absence of patches, administrators can implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Restrict administrative access to trusted users only and enforce strong authentication methods to reduce the risk of compromised admin accounts. 2) Educate administrators to avoid clicking on suspicious links or visiting untrusted websites while logged into the WordPress admin panel. 3) Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious POST requests targeting the vulnerable plugin actions, especially those lacking valid nonces. 4) Review and harden plugin configurations and permissions to minimize the impact of unauthorized changes. 5) Monitor logs for unusual plugin option creation or deletion activities. 6) Consider temporarily disabling the plugin if it is not critical until a patch is available. 7) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) and SameSite cookie attributes to reduce CSRF attack surface. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific plugin actions and attack vectors involved.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, India, France, Netherlands, Brazil, Japan
CVE-2025-14162: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in magblogapi BMLT WordPress Plugin
Description
The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-14162 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the BMLT WordPress Plugin developed by magblogapi, affecting all versions up to and including 3.11.4. The root cause is the absence of nonce validation on two critical plugin actions: 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option'. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and prevent unauthorized actions. Without nonce validation, attackers can craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated administrator (via clicking a link or visiting a malicious page), cause unauthorized creation or deletion of plugin settings. This vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator, making exploitation more challenging. The impact is limited to integrity, as attackers can alter plugin configuration but cannot directly access sensitive data or disrupt service availability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) reflects network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality or availability impact, and limited integrity impact. No patches or exploit code are currently publicly available, but the vulnerability is published and should be addressed promptly. This issue is categorized under CWE-352, a common web security weakness related to CSRF attacks.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the integrity of the BMLT WordPress Plugin’s configuration settings. An attacker can manipulate plugin options by tricking an administrator into executing a forged request, potentially leading to unauthorized changes in plugin behavior or settings. While this does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, altered plugin configurations could indirectly weaken site security or functionality, possibly enabling further attacks or misconfigurations. Organizations relying on this plugin for critical functionality may face operational disruptions or security policy violations. Because exploitation requires administrator interaction, the risk is somewhat mitigated but remains significant in environments with many administrators or where phishing/social engineering is effective. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or availability directly, limiting the scope of damage. No known exploits in the wild reduce immediate risk, but the public disclosure increases the likelihood of future exploitation attempts.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should first check for and apply any official patches or updates from the magblogapi vendor once available. In the absence of patches, administrators can implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Restrict administrative access to trusted users only and enforce strong authentication methods to reduce the risk of compromised admin accounts. 2) Educate administrators to avoid clicking on suspicious links or visiting untrusted websites while logged into the WordPress admin panel. 3) Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious POST requests targeting the vulnerable plugin actions, especially those lacking valid nonces. 4) Review and harden plugin configurations and permissions to minimize the impact of unauthorized changes. 5) Monitor logs for unusual plugin option creation or deletion activities. 6) Consider temporarily disabling the plugin if it is not critical until a patch is available. 7) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) and SameSite cookie attributes to reduce CSRF attack surface. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific plugin actions and attack vectors involved.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-05T20:46:00.918Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 693b918b650da22753edbe34
Added to database: 12/12/2025, 3:52:43 AM
Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 10:58:53 AM
Last updated: 3/23/2026, 6:51:24 PM
Views: 58
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.